Can someone explain how the world is a better place by outlawing business with Iran? Remember, the crime here is selling telecom equipment...
The world is a better [0] place if less people have nuclear weapons. "Outlawing business" (i.e. sanctions) are being used to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Thus it improves the world [1]. [0] Better is somewhat subjective I suppose, but I think we can pretty objectively say "more likely to hold a human civilization 100 years from now". [1] It also undoubtedly makes the world worse in other ways, whether…
> By torpedoing U.S. adherence to the accord, Trump has all but guaranteed its collapse, a move that opens the door to the unfettered resumption of Iran’s nuclear program and unleashes unpredictable escalatory pressures in an already volatile Middle East.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/05/08/a...
> Although the deal didn’t address every concern, it was successfully preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Trump has instead opted for an uncertain future, raising the risks of an Iranian bomb and a U.S-Iranian conflict.
https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/trumps-iran-dea...
> The United States is left without good options moving forward. It is hard to see how this decision serves U.S. interests or regional stability.
https://www.rand.org/blog/2018/05/the-strategic-fallout-of-u...
In addition I believe there are long term costs for a country to be violating agreements for no discernible benefit.