Live data from Hacker News

Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)

robert.ocallahan.org

331–340 of 343 posts

Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)

#331
post #286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which is why iOS should be avoided too. They may appear to be playing kind of nice now, but they won't forever. That blatant disregard for openness is a sure sign they're going to end up the same way, no matter what they say now.

> iOS should be avoided too What would you suggest using?

Android with as little Google as possible, which is none if you're willing to go far enough. Nothing is also an option if you're extra dedicated.

Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)

#332
post #9

Just so we can avoid rehashing the discussion whenever a post encouraging the use of Firefox is posted. - Yes, Mozilla is still the better browser when it comes to privacy. - Yes, Mozilla has made missteps with Pocket and Mr. Robot. - Yes, it is slow/resource heavy on certain Macs with non-default resolutions. Yes, Mozilla is working on a fix. - Yes, it has become really fast for most users after Quantum improvements…

What the relation b/w Mozilla and Mr.Robot ? Could you please enlighten.

Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)

#333
> I know it's not the greatest marketing pitch, but it's the truth.

It's about the worst marketing pitch I can think of.

Tell us reasons to choose Firefox over Chrome. If there are no reasons to prefer Firefox, it doesn't matter whether we lose the ability to choose it.

Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)

#334
post #275

I used to donate to Mozilla, but ever since they fired Brendan I haven't been able to look at them the same way. I use Firefox daily, but actually don't really care if they die because it's their own fault.

Brendan Eich wasn't fired, he stepped down.

Yeah right, Mozilla didn't even fight for him one second.

> “We didn’t act like you’d expect Mozilla to act,” wrote Mozilla Executive Chairwoman Mitchell Baker in a blog post. “We didn’t move fast enough to engage with people once the controversy started. We’re sorry.”

Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)

#335
post #311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"- No, you can't just "fork Chromium" if you don't like the way Google is running the project. Web developers will still make their website work well with whatever Google releases, regardless of standards." Hah, even compiling Chromium takes a huge amount of effort and a workday or so of time. Don't think I'd want to go spelunking through that codebase

I would imagine that compiling Firefox is just as difficult.

Firefox is moving to rust, and for example adding webrender to your project is just few dependencies away, so I'd expect building firefox will only get easier, unlike to google projects where everything is built with their custom tool

Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)

#336
post #218

Genuinely curious - how is it that people don’t trust the website they have an account/email/bank with, but still trust plug-ins that now have access to all your browser activity

This is my only usecase for Chrome, just for incognito mode. Installed it for that. No add-ons nothing.

Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)

#338
post #244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use both firefox and chrome. Chrome does have user profiles, and I can have multiple open at once. Separate cookies but ALSO separate extensions.

You may not have been suggesting otherwise, but in case you're not aware, Firefox also has user profiles and can have multiple open at once.

not so much by default. first you have to launch firefox with a special flag. if firefox is your default browser, and your session started by clicking a link in a different program, youd have to close your browser and click the right shortcut.

unless I am mistaken and -no-remote isnt required anymore.

Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)

#339
post #323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Firefox in Firefox OS was slow and it gave me a feeling that firefox was not for mobile (but I guess it's not true anymore) I genuinely don't understand how Firefox on mobile is slow. I hear this complaint often (along with the complaint of Firefox on desktop not being able to run certain websites, which also never occurs to me), but for how much I try, I never managed to make Firefox on mobile (android) slow. Ther…

Firefox on Android has a notable scrolling delay which drives me nuts. iOS guarantees that the point where your finger first makes contact remains under that finger as you scroll. Most good Android apps can deliver on this promise 99%, but for some reason, Firefox on Android does not.

Firefox on Android here; Can't reproduce the delay, everything seems fine.

Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)

#340
post #17
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They can use Firefox, just not the rendering engine. I expect that would still be considered an adequate move. Nobody I know (bias) has an iOS device and no laptop or PC, so they can also adopt it on their PC.

How is using reskinned Safari with WebKit rendering engine considered adequate move? That would be like putting a Firefox skin over IE6 engine a few years back - it would not help the ecosystem in the way this article asks for.

It would still use any bundled Firefox services. Mozilla makes (most?) of their money from search engine referrals so this alone is likely to be a direct support of them.
Post reply on HN