I live in Toronto and the pilot project remains a very controversial decision basically pitting the interests of commuters against car drivers in what is for all intents and purposes a zero-sum game. The next question is whether there's a solution where everyone wins and the most immediate idea is a subway running down that corridor. Of course, the amount of disruption that would bring to businesses already crying fo…
That's only if the number of car drivers is equal to transit riders + cyclists (and maybe some pedestrians).
Of course that equation is nowhere near equal. The entire reason behind the pilot is because transit vastly outnumbers car drivers.
If you can improve the situation for 10-100x as many people, then why wouldn't you? (all else being equal of course). I'm simplifying things, but I don't understand why you're implying equal footing to both sides.