It does not look like Angular (which is a J2EE all over again), at least.
Update: I did some research
cd material-components-web-codelabs/mdc-101/complete
grep version package-lock.json |wc -l
943
No. Just no.151–160 of 264 posts
It does not look like Angular (which is a J2EE all over again), at least.
Update: I did some research
cd material-components-web-codelabs/mdc-101/complete
grep version package-lock.json |wc -l
943
No. Just no.Looks like this - https://webhint.io Why not collaborate with the people who’ve made this first, google?
I just ran their audit to https://mail.google.com , you guys (googlers) need to speed up your websites first, Gmail is terrible slow lately, just saying...
You think gmail is slow, try the new adwords interface.
Talk about breaking the back button! Do a measurement on a website. Then click one of the Guide links like "Links do not have a discernible name". Page navigates away from the report to some documentation. Click back, report is gone. I get it, it's a single page webapp. But if you do that you need to make all the simple navigations open new tabs. There is a "open link in new button" icon next to each link, but that's…
Ah yeah that's something we want to fix. If you're signed in it keeps the report around but if you're signed-out it's stateless. It's definitely on our to-do list to fix.
ICANN were foolish to go down the new TLD root. Why should Google have ownership over web.dev, and not mozilla (MDN) or w3c?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not web dev related, but related to Google not focusing on performance: the latest Android release of Google Maps is actually non-functional on my Galaxy S7 because of how slow it is. It completely overloads RAM and crashes. Every time. Hilarious.
You should probably try their third world app version: Google Maps Go Edition. (See e.g. https://www.androidinfotech.com/2018/02/google-maps-go-editi... )
I just ran their audit to https://mail.google.com , you guys (googlers) need to speed up your websites first, Gmail is terrible slow lately, just saying...
This is a bad take. By releasing tools like this it helps all websites, including Gmail, have the data on how to speed up their website.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you have a guess why those assets are not cached more aggressively?
This is a complete guess but I suppose one request everyday would be enough to get atleast some idea of how popular any given font is. The page says its to keep them updated but I highly doubt that would be the reason.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a bad take. By releasing tools like this it helps all websites, including Gmail, have the data on how to speed up their website.
Not really. Would you take webdev advice from a company where their own apps are memory hog/leaking garbage (Gmail)? At some point you need to call a square a square.
Wait, was web.dev built by the Gmail team? I always assumed Google was bigger and more complex than that?