Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you gotta go, I guess? I've seen people poop on the train platform in NJ. Really crazy, but Newark does not open the bathrooms until 7-8AM. So when you're waiting for the 3AM train to DC... what you gonna do?
Hold it.
Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
201–210 of 288 posts
Re: Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
>every few years Every few decades for a properly sized and properly functioning system.
Septic tank owner here. I own a single family home, maybe larger setups are different. The recommendation from the installer is that it is pumped and inspected every 3-4 years.
Re: Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I also assume that to ensure water pressure involves electricity - a lot of poorer countries do not have a constant or reliable electricity supply. Today water pressure in the western world is mostly generated by running finely controlled electric pumps constantly, but it wasn't too long ago that water towers were used everywhere to maintain water pressure. The advantage of a water tower is that you can run an inacc…
That's completely forgetting a lot of these areas are water stressed now let alone what they are projected to be in the near future
Re: Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
#204I admire Gates a lot, but for him and way too many technophiles the answer is somehow always tech. Africa does not have a toilet problem. Or a tech problem. Or even a resources problem. They have a lack of intelligent social organization problem; i.e. dysfunctional or non-existent institutions, laws and organizational structures, as well as myriad forms of corruption from top to bottom that make it impossible to crea…
Much more direct to affect change via the private business route. It makes sense his foundation has stayed apolitical.
Re: Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
#205I admire Gates a lot, but for him and way too many technophiles the answer is somehow always tech. Africa does not have a toilet problem. Or a tech problem. Or even a resources problem. They have a lack of intelligent social organization problem; i.e. dysfunctional or non-existent institutions, laws and organizational structures, as well as myriad forms of corruption from top to bottom that make it impossible to crea…
Re: Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
Forums like this would accuse Gates of modern colonialism if he attempted any of the government reforms or accountability measures you describe.
And rightfully so because the history of those kinds of interventions haven’t gone well historically.
Re: Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
#207This reminds me of software developer who favor deep, technical, architectural work instead of attractive, "sounds cool on paper" sort of work. To an outsider, the animations look cool but the engine that drives the animation is cooler to software engineers. Point being, this is not something a normal philanthropist would imagine being cool and awesome. This takes someone who actually cares about shit (in this case l…
Re: Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
#208As an African, I can't help but think that all this charity to Africa might be contributing to us lagging behind in the world. With charities helping out so much, will the local government ever get their act together and provide these functions of public sanitation like they are supposed to? Or will they keep stealing public health funds in the knowledge that charity will always swoop down to save the day? Charities…
Re: Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
#209Re: Gates Foundation spent $200M funding toilet research
#210Okay, I'll bite. I was at a urinal today that had a mesh screen of a style I'd never noticed, and I thought: Some guy with a degree in engineering/fluid dynamics has this on his resume. But when you consider there are what, 3.5 billion or so males on the planet, the benefits of urinal hygiene add up pretty quickly. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/08/urinal-splashback-...
A few years ago (maybe 10) we started getting "waterless" urinals in the UK. I assume that was a materials improvement (extreme hydrophobic coatings?). They have an outlet pipe, but no inlet. That must save a lot of piping and water.
Not only do they use less water, but they /smell better/ -- most of the "smell of urine" results from the pee being added to, and reacting with, water, so no water, no noticeable odour.