Live data from Hacker News

Twitter to remove ‘like’ tool in a bid to improve the quality of debate

telegraph.co.uk

271–278 of 278 posts

Re: Twitter to remove ‘like’ tool in a bid to improve the quality of debate

#271
Honestly, I can't think of any suggestion coming from Twitter execs that would actually solve its usability issues, because they are still approaching it from the POV that Twitter is "bringing humanity closer" or serving some other kind of higher purpose.

When all you have to do is spend 10 minutes on Twitter to realize it's full of political bots, crypto scam bots, humans with short fuses, and celebrities shilling their snake oil products.

Re: Twitter to remove ‘like’ tool in a bid to improve the quality of debate

#272
post #20

I don't think quality of "debate" on Twitter can be salvaged. Everything was designed for "engagement" and turned out to be rage-inducing machine. Quote-retweet is used to send followers to harass the person responsible for the awful tweet. RT is choir-preaching (you're a monster if you don't RT that kicking babies is bad), and replies to twitter-celebrities' tweets give everyone their 15 minutes of fame to post the…

Seems like a lot of people only see the rage storm side of twitter. Most of my stream was peaceful. That said I had the intense joy to get some quote-retweet angst, it's at best half-pleasant.

Re: Twitter to remove ‘like’ tool in a bid to improve the quality of debate

#273
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here's what I'm thinking when companies remove votes or scores or whatever: They're just hiding the problem. Like, people still like the stuff, it's just no longer tracked. They sure as hell won't stop tracking views or whatever. Which are likely (heh) just a factor removed from "likes". The problem is that you're giving fake news the power to dominate million's of people's twitter feeds if you're just ruthless enoug…

This isn't a sarcastic question nor an attempt at snark: have you ever moderated a message board, forum, subreddit, facebook group, etc. with decent post traffic? It's tough. Even something that has a hyperfocused topic (e.g. a subreddit for dogs with sunglasses riding skateboards) will have naysayers of what should and shouldn't be allowed. Someone posts a pic of a dog. It doesn't have sunglasses, but it does have o…

>This isn't a sarcastic question nor an attempt at snark: have you ever moderated a message board, forum, subreddit, facebook group, etc. with decent post traffic?

I actually have! I definitely don't think there's currently a good solution to this problem. But removing likes is ridiculous, too!

Re: Twitter to remove ‘like’ tool in a bid to improve the quality of debate

#275
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see why internet strangers think their walls of text are owed eyeballs. Time is short, the amount of content on the internet is near-infinite, much of that content is just noise, and without a very serious assumption that a source is both trustworthy and informative you'd be better off discarding it and moving on. Reading things thoroughly takes time, and time is money. Scientists are paid to read the current…

TL;DR;

You’re both right.

Re: Twitter to remove ‘like’ tool in a bid to improve the quality of debate

#276
That’s a shame, because I use it as a “save for later” function.

I’ve got hundreds of links to side projects, tips, advice, and inspiration stored in there. Hopefully they give us some warning before it happens so I can scrape them all.

Post reply on HN