Live data from Hacker News

Trump Administration Approves a Plan to Drill for Oil in the Arctic

e360.yale.edu

31–38 of 38 posts

Re: Trump Administration Approves a Plan to Drill for Oil in the Arctic

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Less cynical translation: responsibly developing our resources will make us less reliant on countries like Saudi Arabia, which murdered a journalist, and whose resources have since been branded ‘blood money’

Less cynical, true. But also, less apt. There is no real need for arctic oil, nor Saudi oil for that matter. There are other, easier and cheaper, ways to replace Saudi oil then digging for it in the Arctic.

The United States imports 9% of our yearly crude from Saudi Arabia. More than three times as much comes from the polite, hockey-loving neighbors to the north. [1]

1: https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=727&t=6

Re: Trump Administration Approves a Plan to Drill for Oil in the Arctic

#33
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every investment in oil and gas exploration is a tragic waste of resources tho since the world needs to stop using fossil fuels for generating electricity, transportation, and heat. With that geopolitical games centered around control of oil and gas supplies is utterly pointless.

If we don’t do it, our competitors will. Do you want to live in a world where the Chinese and Russian governments have more power over your life than they do now?

How will the Chinese drill in Alaskan waters?

Re: Trump Administration Approves a Plan to Drill for Oil in the Arctic

#34
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If we don’t do it, our competitors will. Do you want to live in a world where the Chinese and Russian governments have more power over your life than they do now?

How will the Chinese drill in Alaskan waters?

It's not that they'll drill in Alaskan waters. It's that they'll supply energy to people instead of us.

Re: Trump Administration Approves a Plan to Drill for Oil in the Arctic

#36
post #9

“Responsibly developing our resources, in Alaska especially, will allow us to use our energy diplomatically to aid our allies and check our adversaries,” he said in a statement. “That makes America stronger and more influential around the globe.” We feel that when we swing our dick around, it’s not big enough. This will allow to have a bigger dick to swing around. I’m at a loss for a less cynical translation.

Most people wouldn't think that there's anything immoral about private companies using strategy to be better than their competitors as long as they do it through legitimate means. Why should we hold states to a different standard? In this case, the USA would be gaining an advantage by finding a way to utilize an untapped resource. What's wrong with that?

Being able to reduce everything down to an analogy about monkeys fighting over a banana or a dick measuring contest is just the reality of economics. One could even argue that it's an inherent aspect of being alive, at risk of sounding like a social darwinist.

Re: Trump Administration Approves a Plan to Drill for Oil in the Arctic

#37
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quote from the now flagged article. > Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke called the decision an important step toward “American energy dominance.” We can no longer afford the delusion that our leaders are mature and practical men.

I'm struggling to find immaturity or impracticality in that quote. Also your reply is redundant: You posted a sibling comment echoing parent's phallic framing of the topic.

It's not really my problem if you can't see that the quote is about nothing more than the desire for power for it's own sake. And particular it's backwards looking rather than forward looking. Because power in the 21st Century won't be about oil.
Post reply on HN