Earlier quoted context omitted.
> help diversify the tech ecosystem in Berlin and give them access to facilities and other resources. Another way of looking at that, is "gentrify the vibrant neighbourhood by trucking in techbros to displace the artists". It's not new (1) I don't necessarily agree with that framing, but it is understandable and coherent, not a misunderstanding 1) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18282143
"gentrify the vibrant neighbourhood by trucking in techbros to displace the artists" Or bring very high paying jobs that Germany desperately needs, and allow great students to actually do something with their education, which would in turn enable a poor neighbourhood to thrive with ancilliary businesses, restaurants, taxis etc. etc..
Google drops plans for Berlin campus after protests
221–230 of 235 posts
Re: Google drops plans for Berlin campus after protests
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
The mutual exclusivity is valid. Being able to do stuff that requires a lot of time and doesn't make a lot of money (i.e. art) requires a low cost of living. Adding a bunch of people making $200k+ into a neighbourhood does the opposite of that, very rapidly and very predictably.
If you want to be a professional artist, you need people to buy your art -- patrons. In cities without a large number of wealthy people (passing through, if not resident), there aren't many art galleries. Artists often live in different districts or even different cities than their gallerists, but they tend to appreciate their patrons.
Re: Google drops plans for Berlin campus after protests
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
Amazon, Google, Facebook. Look at the castles they've built in Seattle, you aren't getting in unless you are an employee or are escorted by an employee. None of those companies need this level of security, and most other businesses you can literally wander into during office hours, but that is generally not the case with these three.
You are not allowed into any corporate office, in any city - unless you work there. Every company definitely has security, even small one's, and this has nothing to do with the FANGs. Try to waltz into the UBS or Deutchebank building and see if you can just wander around. Most banks have considerably more security than the FANGS and ever since 9/11 many NYC buildings have a ton of security. You need to get a visitors…
Not sure what you've been exposed to, but having wandered many office towers up and down the west coast, vanishingly few have any form of security beyond perhaps a receptionist or a maintenance man who may harass you if requested to do so. Some do have elevators that attempt to enforce access control during certain hours, but this is generally a non-issue in the daytime.
> You need to get a visitors badge with a photo they take of you on the spot to simply go to a meeting in some towers in the US. You need 15 minutes just to get in.
This is an extremely rare request, and complying with it is consistently not worth it in my experience.
Re: Google drops plans for Berlin campus after protests
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want to be a professional artist, you need people to buy your art -- patrons. In cities without a large number of wealthy people (passing through, if not resident), there aren't many art galleries. Artists often live in different districts or even different cities than their gallerists, but they tend to appreciate their patrons.
This may not be relevant, but the great majority of artists will never be professional. Most do their art because they love it, and if they can make some money from it, that is just frosting.
Re: Google drops plans for Berlin campus after protests
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want to be a professional artist, you need people to buy your art -- patrons. In cities without a large number of wealthy people (passing through, if not resident), there aren't many art galleries. Artists often live in different districts or even different cities than their gallerists, but they tend to appreciate their patrons.
This may not be relevant, but the great majority of artists will never be professional. Most do their art because they love it, and if they can make some money from it, that is just frosting.
Re: Google drops plans for Berlin campus after protests
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The mutual exclusivity is naive at best. Your comment shows utter ignorance about what's happening — or already happened — in virtually every major city in every developed country.
How are Tokyo housing prices? Vienna's cost of living is kept down by large amounts of social housing, etc. Gentrification is a side effect of not building housing.
> Gentrification is a side effect of not building housing.
It's a much more complex than simply lack of housing. It's commonly described to neighborhoods, not cities.
Re: Google drops plans for Berlin campus after protests
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
The mutual exclusivity is naive at best. To me, it shows haters' level of intellect. And perhaps explains why they feel left out. They're attached to an ideal of what 'art' (additionally, activism[1]) should be. An outdated, 20th century one. I personally don't like Google. And I understand your framing is hypothetical. But why is tech framed the opposite of art? Why is tech equal to techbro? Yea there are always bad…
The mutual exclusivity is valid. Being able to do stuff that requires a lot of time and doesn't make a lot of money (i.e. art) requires a low cost of living. Adding a bunch of people making $200k+ into a neighbourhood does the opposite of that, very rapidly and very predictably.
However, it should be pointed out that there are really two different programmer cultures. There the corporate one, and then there's, for lack of the better word, "open source" one. The latter is very close to artistic culture but very different from corporate culture. The people are working on what they love, they don't have much money, often they are in precarious situations. I've seen them sharing working space with artists, I've been at parties that mixed hackers and artists without any friction. I've seen self-help institutions meant to help the artists going out of their way to host some kind of strange hacking event.
Re: Google drops plans for Berlin campus after protests
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
The mutual exclusivity is valid. Being able to do stuff that requires a lot of time and doesn't make a lot of money (i.e. art) requires a low cost of living. Adding a bunch of people making $200k+ into a neighbourhood does the opposite of that, very rapidly and very predictably.
As being from an artistic community and a programmer at the same time, I can empathize with both sides. However, it should be pointed out that there are really two different programmer cultures. There the corporate one, and then there's, for lack of the better word, "open source" one. The latter is very close to artistic culture but very different from corporate culture. The people are working on what they love, they…
Re: Google drops plans for Berlin campus after protests
#229As cool as Berlin art is, so is a Google campus for tech people and business in general? If I picture a gentrification activist I think about a purple-haired kid that wouldn't get a job if his life depended on it, making people that might be interested and have the skills to work at Google miss an opportunity. On the other hand, Google could have picked another spot instead of giving up? How is it..?
Re: Google drops plans for Berlin campus after protests
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
Berlin is big, and Germany is much bigger, and there are tons of places for artists. Even in Berlin.
The issue is that Google wanted to go to the very specific and small space in Berlin where tons of artists are. Berlin is "big" (although not as big as you might think), so why would Google need to be in Kreuzberg when it can be ANYWHERE else.