Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Hetzner is not a reasonable choice for servers IMO, its akin to hosting in a datahole in Dallas, expect mixed bandwidth quality and questionable policies when issues arise. Really surprised to hear that, can you please elaborate? I only heard good things about them up until now... > Comparatively, OVH looks stable. What kind of stable do you mean? Bandwidth, latency, average I/O ops, CPU load?
Hetzner has had peering and jitter issues for years, in the past they would nullroute your server's IP for minor DOSes: https://www.reddit.com/r/seedboxes/comments/6fwphr/hetzner_i... Hetzner does pay lip service to improving their network, but its akin to ColoCrossing, the internal network infrastructure is not amazing due to budget constraints, and the peering situation isn't apt to improve as its essentially money…
Thanks a lot! Changed my perspective.