Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are assuming the XPS is the developer edition. I am also running Ubuntu on my XPS, but it came with windows orginaly. I also don't have any hardware issues to speak of.
How is your battery life? I also installed ubuntu on my xps, and I'm only getting about 2 hours max, although I always keep it plugged in, so it's not a real issue for me. As for hardware issues, I had to download wireless drivers, which was a slight pain since there is no ethernet port. I was able to get my video card working with optimus, but that wasn't non trivial. I wound up disabling my track pad and using a mo…
Ditching Windows: 2 Weeks with Ubuntu Linux on the Dell XPS 13
181–190 of 235 posts
Re: Ditching Windows: 2 Weeks with Ubuntu Linux on the Dell XPS 13
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, my day job is supporting an application across Win/Mac/Linux. Even ignoring the graphics, Apple is easily the hardest to support. I don't really care if you haven't read a magazine article on it. And to pretend like FrostBite doesn't matter is ridiculous.
It doesn't matter for developers that want to support OS X, as it is mostly focused on game consoles and Windows. Whereas the ones I listed do support those systems, Apple platforms, Android and GNU/Linux.
Also, just noticed that you lumped in Unity with AAA, lolz. What's next libgdx?
Re: Ditching Windows: 2 Weeks with Ubuntu Linux on the Dell XPS 13
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's still a PITA to deploy a compiled app on Linux with unclear glibc versions and amazingly it's worse than MS DLL hell of MSVC redistributable shambles. One option is to statically link against musl libc [1]. The kernel ABI is about the only stable thing you can rely on (which is something you _can't_ rely on for macOS or Windows). [1] https://www.musl-libc.org/
Is it not possible to link glibc staticalliy? IIRC musl has readability and code size in mind while glibc optimizes for performance at the cost of readability and codesize.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3430400/linux-static-lin...
Can't imagine many Linux gamers are going to need NSS support in their game binaries. It's a bit of a stretch to say glibc doesn't support static linking, perhaps "officially" it doesn't, its just not all the extended features are going to work.
Static linking is generally going to be frowned upon these days however since you're effectively linking security issues into the binary forever.
Re: Ditching Windows: 2 Weeks with Ubuntu Linux on the Dell XPS 13
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
It doesn't matter for developers that want to support OS X, as it is mostly focused on game consoles and Windows. Whereas the ones I listed do support those systems, Apple platforms, Android and GNU/Linux.
So wait, the AAA developers not supporting don't count against your argument? Even in the case of Blizzard who has famously been one of the biggest Mac supporters? Isn't "all AAA support Mac... except all the ones that don't support Mac" a tautology? Also, just noticed that you lumped in Unity with AAA, lolz. What's next libgdx?
There are plenty of other AAA studios using Unreal, Unity, CryEngine.
Maybe you should check again the names of some studios using Unity, ever heard of Nintendo and Microsoft?
Re: Ditching Windows: 2 Weeks with Ubuntu Linux on the Dell XPS 13
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
The article author was on a Linux podcast about a week ago and clarified that he couldn't reproduce the Mint issue, as it seemed to properly detect it when he retried later. But he had set strict guidelines for the article--basically, that he had to do this from a lifelong Windows user's perspective. So if the distro didn't work the first time, he moved on to the next one.
Yeah, I got that and I am absolutely fine with it. A bit strange though that this happened. Maybe he scrambled something during trying the live image... As I migrated not only me, but also (non-technical) other users I would have wanted to stick to Mint even at the cost of jumping through hoops as the migration is said to be easier for Windows users (as compared to eg. Ubuntu). We never looked back.
Re: Ditching Windows: 2 Weeks with Ubuntu Linux on the Dell XPS 13
#186Re: Ditching Windows: 2 Weeks with Ubuntu Linux on the Dell XPS 13
#187The author praises the package manager as a positive, not a negative as I usually see from people used to downloading *.exe installers. He's used other distros, plus a Mac, in the past, but I wonder if phone app stores (plus Windows' own software store) have made this become a more natural method of installing software for the average user?
I switched from Windows to Linux before I had a smartphone and appreciate the package manager. I got a Macbook for work and lamented the lack of package manager (homebrew is a weak substitute in several ways).
Re: Ditching Windows: 2 Weeks with Ubuntu Linux on the Dell XPS 13
#188Re: Ditching Windows: 2 Weeks with Ubuntu Linux on the Dell XPS 13
#189I freakin' love Linux as a personal workstation OS. I got into it in 1995, back in the days when Linux was punk rawk and you had to dig around on tsx-11 and sunsite to find things to run on it. I still dual-booted Windows there for a few years. Then I noticed something: Windows would, suddenly and without warning, stop working. As in, blue screen on first boot. All the way up through Windows 2000 -- 9x, NT, didn't ma…
The only experience I had with Slackware was just that, I installed it, found out there is no package manager and installed Ubuntu.
I have a hard time understanding why someone would use Slackware when there is distros that is literally better at every aspect.
Re: Ditching Windows: 2 Weeks with Ubuntu Linux on the Dell XPS 13
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have an xps 13 dual booted with ubuntu and windows without any driver issues. Everything works great besides the lousy keyboard and trackpad, and that's all Dell. Actually, there are a few problems: windows can't render fonts clearly a lot of the time for some reason, and it keeps losing the current time, and it keeps erasing GRUB after windows updates. Ubuntu itself runs great
It is probably "losing" time because it assumes the system clock is set to local time while Linux assumes it is UTC. If either use a network time service to reset the clock, the other will look wrong between reboots. The easiest solution is to use localtime on Linux. Windows can run with the system clock set to UTC but I hear it is rare so it my not be well supported. See more here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.p…