Live data from Hacker News

Tesla Third Quarter 2018 Update [pdf]

ir.tesla.com

351–360 of 418 posts

Re: Tesla Third Quarter 2018 Update [pdf]

#351
post #257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Realistically, people who could afford an electric car are more likely to take a plane and rent a car when traveling, unless they travel all the time as part of their job, then they’d be using ridesharing exclusively. But people tend to be dominated by edge cases instead of giving up a small amount of mobility.

>people who could afford an electric car are more likely to take a plane and rent a car when traveling, unless they travel all the time as part of their job, then they’d be using ridesharing exclusively. What is this based on? I know several people with electric cars and none of us take planes and rent cars on trips unless they're to another country. I drive to California and Austin all the time and the Tesla is the…

>What is this based on?

This is the "everything is Silicon Valley" view of the world.

Another hilarious one is: "why doesn't everyone just bike to work?"

Re: Tesla Third Quarter 2018 Update [pdf]

#352
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All the other companies combined probably have fewer EVs on the road than Tesla. Building a charger network for 200,000+ Teslas makes sense, but building a similar network for 20,000 BMWs doesn't.

I'm not sure where you get your information, but Tesla has 360k vehicles produced as of Q2 3018. The leaf alone is at 350k, making it "world's all-time best-selling highway-capable electric car in history". I think it's clear that Tesla comment is not true.

>I'm not sure where you get your information,

Laughable, isn't it? Once second of Google would prove it wrong. People literally don't care about reality when it comes to this company. Some PR site says it, and it becomes "fact". The list of things people claim Tesla has done/can do that has no basis in reality is long and growing longer.

Re: Tesla Third Quarter 2018 Update [pdf]

#353
post #348

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Modigliani-Miller 'theorem' is dangerous nonsense. It proves a fact about a model rather than a fact about the real world. From Wikipedia " The basic theorem states that in the absence of taxes, bankruptcy costs, agency costs, and asymmetric information, and in an efficient market, the value of a firm is unaffected by how that firm is financed ". See anything wrong with this picture?

I agree with you that the grandparent misinterpreted the theorem as the Wikipedia article includes something similar to your reply: "These results might seem irrelevant (after all, none of the conditions are met in the real world), but the theorem is still taught and studied because it tells something very important. That is, capital structure matters precisely because one or more of these assumptions is violated ."…

But it's already painfully obvious that one or more of the assumptions is violated. That should only be surprising if you've spent years being indoctrinated by academic finance or economics.

Re: Tesla Third Quarter 2018 Update [pdf]

#354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesla currently has 400 supercharger sites in Europe, 2400 bays in total, by 2020 Ionity, which is a consortium of Daimler, BMW, Porsche, Ford, Audi and VW, is planning to build 400 sites, 2400 bays total, most with a 350kW charging capacity, which is double the power of Tesla’s chargers. There are also about 5000 CCS chargers already existing in Europe, lower power but ‘destination chargers’ will probably be valuabl…

All chargers are not created equal. "Planning" to build something is not building it. 350kW is a lot of energy and you need to pay for all the power electronics to run that much DC power. I have no doubt the'll start building chargers but I think the ramp up will be slower and the power levels will be lower than what people think. Most cars can't even charge at 350kW because their batteries are too small. You'd damag…

You can track Ionity‘s progress here: https://ionity.evapi.de/#/

I have no doubt that they are serious and ambitious, but they are so far behind Tesla that it‘s not likely that they will catch up until 2020. Also, they are planning to place their fast chargers only 120 Km apart to accommodate for a wider range of vehicles, which puts them at a disadvantage too.

Re: Tesla Third Quarter 2018 Update [pdf]

#355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm pretty sure every Nissan dealer that sells a leaf must operate a charging station. Granted they're not as easy to access at the supercharger network... but it exists.

They do, but no one wants to go to one of the few Nissan dealers in their area to charge their car in the event they need it. Not to mention, many dealers only have 1-2 chargers total, which is not sustainable for the number of cars that are (or will be) sold. Plus, what about the Bolt, Volt, i3, Soul EV, or any number of other EVs? They wouldn't be comfortable or possibly even welcome at a Nissan dealership to charg…

>They do, but no one wants to go to one of the few Nissan dealers in their area to charge their car in the event they need it.

Where I live we have 2 Nissan dealers and zero Supercharging stations.

Re: Tesla Third Quarter 2018 Update [pdf]

#356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't lie to investors, that's securities fraud. He's lucky he wasn't facing criminal charges.

What was the lie exactly? "Funding secured" after the Saudi repeated multiple times that they would pay cash for the operation – which was refused repeatedly in the past by Elon himself? Since most shareholders wanted to remain, the cost of the operation was estimated to be below $20B so who doubt that the funding wasn't secured?

Matt Levine's Money Stuff [0] is a great read on problem with Musk's "funding secured" tweet.

[0] https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-08-13/funding-f...

Re: Tesla Third Quarter 2018 Update [pdf]

#357
post #187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually there are a lot of bonds outstanding Per http://ir.tesla.com/static-files/6db4f56e-1532-4cd6-b8dc-3ff... they have $230 million due in Nov 2018, $920 million due in March 2019, $560 million due in Nov 2019, $113 million due in Dec 2020, $1,380 million due March 2021, and $977.5 million due in March 2022. Plus coupons on all of these payable regularly between now and then. By my count this totals $4.1805 bill…

A lot of companies have a lot of bonds out. Its not necessarily unhealthy to keep some debt around, especially through the 2013 through 2017 timeframe when interest rates were abnormally low. Elon will have to roll over the debt somehow: either into stock offerings or maybe into new bonds. The meager profits reported this quarter aren't anywhere near the amount they need to pay off those debts... even if the profits…

>Its not necessarily unhealthy to keep some debt around, especially through the 2013 through 2017 timeframe when interest rates were abnormally low.

The Tesla bonds in question have a coupon of 5.3% and were sold into one of the lowest interest rate environments in history. They currently have an 8.5% yield. Rolling debt over on those terms is not fun.

Re: Tesla Third Quarter 2018 Update [pdf]

#358
post #261

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree - I've been driving EVs exclusively (Ford Focus Electric followed by Tesla MS) since 2013 in So Cal and can attest to how poor user experience is with 3rd party charge networks. First of all, there are 4+ distinct networks each requiring separate account/payment setup and RFIDs. They are often broken, fully used, overpriced or cumbersome to start. Most are L2 with 20-30A - charging at To the contrary, user…

> Partnership/expansion of for-profit networks will never get there. So people believe that Tesla is going to upend the entire auto industry, but can't believe that some company will figure out how to build nice charging stations? So many contradictions in the arguments here. Yes, the Supercharger network was, basically, necessary for Tesla to reach a critical acceptance level. But operating and maintaining those sta…

> The idea that the major fuelling stations won't start adding fast chargers is incredibly naive. They already have the infrastructure and real estate.

Do they?

I was under the impression most fueling stations had standard single-phase 200A hookups to the grid.

So, at minimum, that would mean an electrical upgrade, no?

Re: Tesla Third Quarter 2018 Update [pdf]

#359
post #328

One massive advantage that I'm not sure most people realize quite yet is the Supercharger network. No manufacturer (other than Porsche talking about it recently) has actually built out chargers for their cars. Every other electric car has to rely on a broken, sparse, expensive charger network. Blink chargers and some ChargePoint chargers are expensive in many places ($2 an hour!), and Blink is notorious for having br…

The supercharger network is indeed a massive advantage for Tesla. For now, it's obviously necessary, since the range of the cars on the road is generally limited to 200-300 miles. But even in 3-4 years, when new Teslas likely have a range of 400 miles, or in 7-8 years when the standard range is maybe 600 miles, it will grant drivers the certainty that even if they forget to charge at home or at work for several days,…

> Given that the amount of Teslas on the roads is growing exponentially these months

There's nothing exponential about the rate of growth of Teslas. Fast != exponential.

Re: Tesla Third Quarter 2018 Update [pdf]

#360

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's funny you say that because that's the exact reason Superchargers exist. The other chargers in question charge incredibly slowly compared to a Supercharger. Teslas main advantage was that they had to foresight to realize that people wouldn't swap to electric vehicles unless they could have a similar experience to pulling up, filling up your tank, and driving off. A Supercharger is the closest thing - 0 to full in…

20 to 25 minutes is still an eternity compared to gasoline. Yes, it's faster than the other chargers, but that's about the same amount of time an oil change takes. That's something people have to plan around since it's not 3-4 minutes.

That seems like a perk to hosting businesses.
Post reply on HN