Earlier quoted context omitted.
What’s the mobile vs computer demographics here? Me thinks twitter is telling a little twattle.
Just compare the other comments in this very thread: > I do exactly that behavior all the time. > Can't disagree with Twitter's reasoning there, anecdotally I myself have done that many times. > I spoke with a someone recently who uses gmail on his Android device. An ad at the top that resembles an email appears about a second after his real emails appear, timed perfectly to interrupt his attempt to tap and read his…
Facebook lured advertisers by inflating video ad-watch times: lawsuit
91–100 of 185 posts
Re: Facebook lured advertisers by inflating video ad-watch times: lawsuit
#92Something is really off with the numbers on Facebook (in my opinion on Google too, but there I'm not so sure)
Re: Facebook lured advertisers by inflating video ad-watch times: lawsuit
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
Target has teams with context and experience in how to properly use, measure and attribute those numbers. 99% of start-ups, even very well funded ones, don't.
What do youbmean by that? When I buy something at Target stores, they have absolutely no way to attribute whether I saw something on TV, a billboard, the aisle, their junk mail in my mailbox, or online.
Re: Facebook lured advertisers by inflating video ad-watch times: lawsuit
#94On a side note, if you use instagram, I'm not sure if you've noticed, but literally every 3-4 pictures is an ad now. It's so annoying, they're completely ruining the experience and it affects my retention rate and my will to come back.
Re: Facebook lured advertisers by inflating video ad-watch times: lawsuit
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
I too can support with anecdotal evidence for that (my wife). One of her habits is browsing Facebook ads and she end up actually buying stuff from those sites.
What products has she bought?
Re: Facebook lured advertisers by inflating video ad-watch times: lawsuit
#96Re: Facebook lured advertisers by inflating video ad-watch times: lawsuit
#97Re: Facebook lured advertisers by inflating video ad-watch times: lawsuit
#98Is this company legit imploding?
At this point they might be "too big to fail".
Re: Facebook lured advertisers by inflating video ad-watch times: lawsuit
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am a direct response marketer, and only manage ad campaigns that provably generate revenue. Over $10,000,000 spend across more than a dozen companies. I can tell you that for many products Facebook absolutely outperforms Google.
For sure there are people who are careful with their spending and smart with their marketing. But there's been too many reports of bot activity, fake likes, fake followers in those platforms that I'm sure many companies and marketing departments fall for them. Not everyone does as good job as you Im sure. Google, as far as I know, was never caught in dark ui patterns or fake number reports to generate revenue. They d…
Autoplay videos with ads?
Re: Facebook lured advertisers by inflating video ad-watch times: lawsuit
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just as a point of reference, as a very infrequent Instagram user (Maybe once a week, often much less) I have yet to see a single ad. So it seems like they scale the amount of ads they show depending on how heavily you use the service.
I've also stopped using it. I just went there for the first time in months and counted the sponsored posts. They appear every 4, 5 or 6 posts. Are you sure you don't mistake sponsored post for real ones?