Zuckerberg Faces Anger Over Facebook Executive’s Kavanaugh Support

Post by fareesh » Fri, Oct 05, 2018, 7:04 PM UTC

archagon wrote: post #100

fareesh wrote: post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong - I don't live in America so my facts may be incomplete. 100+ women have come forward for Judge Kavanaugh's character. The sum total of everyone he has worked with during his time as a judge (which is much more relevant than what he did while at parties), have given him glowing endorsements. My opinion is based on evidence, and the presumption of innocence. Those are not fe…

> Justice Ginsberg said she and her husband would move to New Zealand if the Republican candidate became President. That is coming from the reigning liberal champion on the court. Honestly, I think she has set the bar as far as irresponsible partisan remarks are concerned. Earlier today, it was reported that Trump thought that a news clip of an old missile launch was a preemptive nuclear strike by North Korea, and th…

Post by fareesh » Fri, Oct 05, 2018, 7:15 PM UTC

lillesvin wrote: post #92

kamaal wrote: post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>If people are uncomfortable with their CEO eating meat then they should be free to ask about it and voice their opinions. Expecting a person A to change their way of life, for an inconsequential act, because other person B completely irrelevant to A or A action's feels 'uncomfortable', then B has way over stepped in feeling entitled to what they want from life and society. You don't get to dictate what religion som…

You conveniently left out the part just after what you quoted that said: "If the CEO wants to change anything because of that is entirely up to him/her [...]" I didn't say—nor did I mean to imply—that anyone should "change their way of life", "dictate what religion some one[sic] should practice" or "wanting to control other people's life". I said, and I very literally meant, "they should be free to ask about it and v…

Post by exmicrosoldier » Sat, Oct 06, 2018, 12:08 AM UTC

chrisco255 wrote: post #35

exmicrosoldier wrote: post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the context of most supreme court nominees, combined with the amount of contoversy surrounding his appointment yes. Every tier one tech company I ever worked for would not hire someone that caused that much ill will, from a culture perspective. The brand of the supreme court is seen as a wise, impartial, authorative, servant of the people. An imperious, rabidly partisan, agressive, evasive, offended, entitled boy…

Who caused the ill will? The man accused of something he didn't do? Or the Democrats who manufactured a mock trial with all the optics of one and with none of the evidence and due process of one.

Post by MaysonL » Sat, Oct 06, 2018, 2:32 AM UTC

thecleaner wrote: post #104

Ascendency wrote: post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kavanaugh didn’t just deny that he committed the assault, he denied drinking, obvious jokes, and pretended to be a church going, sober, virgin. Well, we have loads of evidence that the latter is false throughout high school, college, and law school. If instead of admitting what he did do as in the past, but choosing to lie, not once but repeatedly, baldly, and swearing to god, makes him far, far less credible in deny…

> Well, we have loads of evidence that the latter is false throughout high school, college, and law school Where is the evidence ? For him to be a virgin, there literally can't be any evidence unless somebody actually watched him (which would be very terrible). As far as swearing to God goes and being non-drinking and church going, these are things you argue while selecting the class president not a supreme court jud…

Post by yostrovs » Sat, Oct 06, 2018, 12:31 PM UTC

MaysonL wrote: post #107

thecleaner wrote: post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Well, we have loads of evidence that the latter is false throughout high school, college, and law school Where is the evidence ? For him to be a virgin, there literally can't be any evidence unless somebody actually watched him (which would be very terrible). As far as swearing to God goes and being non-drinking and church going, these are things you argue while selecting the class president not a supreme court jud…

The disrespect he showed to numerous Senators, and the numver of questions he refused to answer, should alone be enough to disqualify him.