Live data from Hacker News

GitHub and Jira Software Integration

blog.github.com

191–200 of 222 posts

Re: GitHub and Jira Software Integration

#191
post #40
post #26

I don't understand the negativity in this thread. Or why people are using this post as an impetus to (ostensibly) move to gitlab. Or lament the decline and fall of github. Nobody is forcing anyone to use Jira. Nobody is forcing anyone to use Github. You can continue to use both without adopting any of the UX or design or workflows or whatever of the other. This blog post is just saying "now we have an officially-supp…

It's because many of us have worked at companies that use JIRA extensively. It's a tool that marks the sign that a company cares more about the management of staff as units, instead of caring about employees as breathing and creative forces. It makes management's job easier, but it does nothing for the managed, except lead to frustration and hundreds of emails that have to be waded through for that 5% chance of relev…

Exactly. Opportunity cost. No software organization can do everything at the same time. What GitHub is saying with this is "It's more important for us to integrate with this thing that your management wants, than to fix any of those bugs you filed".

I was afraid the acquisition by Microsoft was going to lead to it becoming more enterprise-oriented and less user-oriented, and it appears like that's exactly what's happening.

Re: GitHub and Jira Software Integration

#192
post #40
post #26

I don't understand the negativity in this thread. Or why people are using this post as an impetus to (ostensibly) move to gitlab. Or lament the decline and fall of github. Nobody is forcing anyone to use Jira. Nobody is forcing anyone to use Github. You can continue to use both without adopting any of the UX or design or workflows or whatever of the other. This blog post is just saying "now we have an officially-supp…

It's because many of us have worked at companies that use JIRA extensively. It's a tool that marks the sign that a company cares more about the management of staff as units, instead of caring about employees as breathing and creative forces. It makes management's job easier, but it does nothing for the managed, except lead to frustration and hundreds of emails that have to be waded through for that 5% chance of relev…

Hello, thank you for mentioning GitLab.

Speaking of >making programmer's job easierHere's more about it https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/topics/autodevops/

Re: GitHub and Jira Software Integration

#193
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I gently suggest that you examine this thinking, hard. You obviously don’t believe that you have a choice in the matter today. But you also seem to have a helpless belief that you won’t have a choice in the matter tomorrow, nor do you seem to believe there are things you can do to have a choice tomorrow. So instead, you are wishing that something else would force the universe to give you what you want, but without yo…

This is all well and good but I don't think the thinking is wrong, Jira is built and sold to managers who have the authority to impose it on their engineers, (typically dumping a lot of management responsibility onto the engineers in the process but that's a different issue). There's really not much you can do in a lot of orgs except hope that Jira starts to stagnate and rot. So I understand the frustration when some…

Nope, nope, nope.

If Jira didn’t exist, someone would build it, because said managers have the budget and authority to spend.

If we want a different management culture, we have to work on the culture directly. Which is the entire point of agile, lean, and other movements.

As for managers buying it and imposing it on their engineers, we need to recognize that said managers are users too, and their needs matter. It’s not like there’s a good tool and a shitty tool, and the engineers and managers put in a requisition for the good tool, but the CFO plays golf with the shitty tool’s VP of Sales and they buy the shitty tool.

Managers want Jira for a reason. We may not like the reason, but that doesn’t mean they’re wrong, and it especially doesn’t mean that if we burned Jira down to the ground its replacement wouldn’t address the reasons managers want Jira.

If we believe that software can do what managers and engineers need doing without being as craptastic as Jira, we need to build it.

But we can’t ignore what managers need. We either give them something else that solves their problem, or we stop worrying about Jira and get them to approach software development in a new way.

Re: GitHub and Jira Software Integration

#194
post #34

Ok, so finally time to move on to Gitlab, my weekend is gone! While from what I read GH issues are not going away, I won't be surprised if GH finally becomes a pure enterprisey product. My only concern is what happens when Gitlab is acquired? If someone from GL can confirm that they have serious checks and balances in place to not let the users who make Gitlab succeed be left to fend for themselves, can be a killing…

There has been a GitLab+JIRA integration for some time already.

That's right. Here's more info about it https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/integrations/jira.ht...

Re: GitHub and Jira Software Integration

#195
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For me that’s exactly the problem with JIRA. Each team I’ve worked with uses a different board, workflow, and what not. I still don’t understand the hierarchy. And since it is infinitely configurable, the UX is just horrible. It’s not optimised for any particular audience and is all over the place.

For me this is a huge benefit: the engineering team, product management team, qa team, ux team, etc. can each see the things that are relevant to them in the way that they like while still being able to pass the tasks off to the other teams / track them if they would like. You have to put in work to make each flow work for each customer & make sure that the tags are standardized, but once thats in place its super eas…

My reading of this is: software development is still such a disorganized activity that the industry considers it acceptable for each organization to simply make up their own system. Jira is built to work for any such system, no matter how crazy, and your particular instance can change completely at any time (like if your manager reads the wrong blog post over lunch).

This does not make me feel any better about Jira. It's like those videos of early attempts at flight, and Jira is bragging that they make flapping wings and spinning wings and triplane wings and bird-shaped wings -- whatever you want! Great for their company, not so great for me.

Re: GitHub and Jira Software Integration

#196
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There are a million project management apps that a small team can use and there is 0 aside from Jira that large enterprises can use. I'm pretty sure that's wrong; there are large enterprises that use project management software but don't use Jira at all.

Yes there are and read what people are writing about those systems they are even more abysmal thats why Atlassian dominates this market.

I would like to see the issue tracker at Apple.

Re: GitHub and Jira Software Integration

#197
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are a lot of engineers on HackerNews who have had terrible experiences with Jira (I'm one of them). You're correct, you don't have to migrate; However, if you work at a company where management all of a sudden realizes — "oh now we can integrate Jira for our tasks". It's a slippery slope down the Jira road. I've had 3 jobs where we used Jira and it was always a nightmare. At Uber ATG it sucked because it was sl…

Somewhere along this thread it became an indictment of Jira. I've spent a tonne of time over the years at multiple orgs both using Jira and trying to move away from it. 10 years later.. I'm back on Jira and won't move. The issues I find (including speed) are really due to the incredibly flexibility of Jira, and things not being thought out by users. Ultimately, I feel like it's akin to the old adage about perl - it d…

[deleted]

Re: GitHub and Jira Software Integration

#198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's less a sign of how bad JIRA is, and more how bad project management and project managers are in software development. JIRA can be a decent tool. The issue is the way that 90% of all businesses big and small use it, is just so that managers can shrug off any responsibility for understanding the projects they're managing, and wall themselves off in JIRA bureaucracy. Engineers have not taken too kindly to i…

I've never seen a JIRA installation that isn't slow as hell. Project Manager types dont mind JIRA slowness for some reason. Prbly have too much time in their meetings to sit and wait around.

If you think JIRA is slow, you should check out tools like HP Quality Center. That thing was such a piece of garbage the last time I had it foisted on me (2015), it:

- made JIRA look fast

- only ran in IE6

- required a special MSIE shell to run in Win7

- despite running only in IE6/Windows, it had several places where it broke from the standard Windows UX

Re: GitHub and Jira Software Integration

#199
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is all well and good but I don't think the thinking is wrong, Jira is built and sold to managers who have the authority to impose it on their engineers, (typically dumping a lot of management responsibility onto the engineers in the process but that's a different issue). There's really not much you can do in a lot of orgs except hope that Jira starts to stagnate and rot. So I understand the frustration when some…

Nope, nope, nope. If Jira didn’t exist, someone would build it, because said managers have the budget and authority to spend. If we want a different management culture, we have to work on the culture directly. Which is the entire point of agile, lean, and other movements. As for managers buying it and imposing it on their engineers, we need to recognize that said managers are users too, and their needs matter. It’s n…

There are tools that solve the problems. It's called GitLab Issue Boards or Phabricator.

Re: GitHub and Jira Software Integration

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

JIRA makes it dangerously easy to implement overly bureaucratic processes. A certain kind of organization is drawn to it for that reason. Even a healthy organization switching to JIRA can get carried away with the tools now at its disposal. JIRA is a software product but also a social institution, an organizational philosophy. Sure, you can have the software without the attitude or vice versa, but use of JIRA is stil…

So your argument is that JIRA is too good and gives the user too much freedom to do what they want? Software is a tool, it is there to do what the user wants, a good tool does not limit the user. Organizational processes are just that, those selected by the org. JIRA is successful because it is a good tool that gives power to the users. Anyone is free to build a competitor to JIRA, but I would argue that if the devel…

“The user” is not a monolithic entity. JIRA transfers power from labor to management. Obviously a certain kind of management loves that, but as a worker, it’s in your interest to stay away.

Of course you can use JIRA as just a tool, but it tends to take on a life of its own, becoming central to his work is allocated and performance is assessed.

Post reply on HN