Live data from Hacker News

The annoying habits of highly effective people

economist.com

111–120 of 230 posts

Re: The annoying habits of highly effective people

#111

Rsing at 4:00am is more likely to either be the symptom of someone addicted to their work above all else but it also probably shows the fragility of life at the top! If you were Tim Cook, what would you do next in a company with billions of spare cash to keep the investors away from your door and without losing focus? I don't think I would sleep if that was me!

Could also just be a circadian rythm thing. I’m sure there are many otherwise normal people who’s biological clock would prefer to sleep early and wake up at 4.

Re: The annoying habits of highly effective people

#112
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't bet on an opportunity if you don't have any money to bet. I've lost count of how many ambitious and talented people I know who had ideas they wanted to bet on, but couldn't because of lack of disposable funds. Having the resources to take risks is the number one factor to succeeding, I think. Being able to identify good opportunities comes after that.

Even if you have no money you can bet your personal time and effort. I agree that having financial resources is a huge leg up, but I don't believe it's mandatory. My beliefs are formed from personal experience. I came from a working class family that lived below the poverty line. My parents kicked me out at 18 with a warning that if I ever wanted to come back I'd better be ready to pay them rent. (Resolved that I wou…

[deleted]

Re: The annoying habits of highly effective people

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

" it's a lot easier to get up at 5am, shake hands firmly, and dress for success" Let's not be superfluous. Being a CEO is hard, even the 5 am rising and 'hand shaking' parts.

>>Being a CEO is hard Not necessarily. It completely depends on the company and the industry.

Unless your company is small, being a CEO is hard. Knowing about all projects and developments in the company (often several hundred projects and initiatives) and deciding on which opportunities to take is not an easy job.

Re: The annoying habits of highly effective people

#114
post #36
post #3

Never understood people's infatuation with reading CEO biographies. I've read a few and never found anything in it that could relate to. May be I am not meant to be one of those people. Even if I worked hard, got in at work at 5 am every day, I don't think I could go from being a lowely team lead to cto or CEO of a multi billion dollar corporation. I don't think it just works that way. I could be very wrong, but that…

Why do you think that you couldn't become the CTO? Serious question. What qualities are you lacking?

Being interested in understanding problems in detail and working on solutions can be disqualifying for a CTO position. As a CTO you must have an overview of everything that's going on and where the company is heading. That means, you won't have any time getting lost in the nitty-gritty of a project or problem. Understanding everything a bit but nothing in perfect detail is something many people dislike but which is unavoidable as a CTO.

Re: The annoying habits of highly effective people

#115
"The largely dominant meritocratic paradigm of highly competitive Western cultures is rooted on the belief that success is due mainly, if not exclusively, to personal qualities such as talent, intelligence, skills, smartness, efforts, willfulness, hard work or risk taking. Sometimes, we are willing to admit that a certain degree of luck could also play a role in achieving significant material success.

But, as a matter of fact, it is rather common to underestimate the importance of external forces in individual successful stories. It is very well known that intelligence (or, more in general, talent and personal qualities) exhibits a Gaussian distribution among the population, whereas the distribution of wealth - often considered a proxy of success - follows typically a power law (Pareto law), with a large majority of poor people and a very small number of billionaires. Such a discrepancy between a Normal distribution of inputs, with a typical scale (the average talent or intelligence), and the scale invariant distribution of outputs, suggests that some hidden ingredient is at work behind the scenes."

I would highly recommend people here to take a look at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07068

Re: The annoying habits of highly effective people

#116

"The largely dominant meritocratic paradigm of highly competitive Western cultures is rooted on the belief that success is due mainly, if not exclusively, to personal qualities such as talent, intelligence, skills, smartness, efforts, willfulness, hard work or risk taking. Sometimes, we are willing to admit that a certain degree of luck could also play a role in achieving significant material success. But, as a matte…

I understand what you are saying to a degree, however I've had more success than many colleagues due to me spending time every day to improve myself (usually technically). What you are saying is like saying some people are thin due to genetics, which can be true, but also many people are thin because they workout.

Re: The annoying habits of highly effective people

#117

"The largely dominant meritocratic paradigm of highly competitive Western cultures is rooted on the belief that success is due mainly, if not exclusively, to personal qualities such as talent, intelligence, skills, smartness, efforts, willfulness, hard work or risk taking. Sometimes, we are willing to admit that a certain degree of luck could also play a role in achieving significant material success. But, as a matte…

I understand what you are saying to a degree, however I've had more success than many colleagues due to me spending time every day to improve myself (usually technically). What you are saying is like saying some people are thin due to genetics, which can be true, but also many people are thin because they workout.

What you're saying is anecdotal.

Re: The annoying habits of highly effective people

#118
post #3

Never understood people's infatuation with reading CEO biographies. I've read a few and never found anything in it that could relate to. May be I am not meant to be one of those people. Even if I worked hard, got in at work at 5 am every day, I don't think I could go from being a lowely team lead to cto or CEO of a multi billion dollar corporation. I don't think it just works that way. I could be very wrong, but that…

People get to the top by being manipulative and making themselves look good.

I would imagine similar traits lead to writing a biography that sells well.

Re: The annoying habits of highly effective people

#119

"The largely dominant meritocratic paradigm of highly competitive Western cultures is rooted on the belief that success is due mainly, if not exclusively, to personal qualities such as talent, intelligence, skills, smartness, efforts, willfulness, hard work or risk taking. Sometimes, we are willing to admit that a certain degree of luck could also play a role in achieving significant material success. But, as a matte…

I understand what you are saying to a degree, however I've had more success than many colleagues due to me spending time every day to improve myself (usually technically). What you are saying is like saying some people are thin due to genetics, which can be true, but also many people are thin because they workout.

1. how do you know you are not a screaming asshole that other people tolerate, with your inflated sense of self worth about your technical ability being your motivator for demanding more - so you call it success.

Have you overcome any longstanding relationship issues with anyone in your life? have you supported someone through a mental breakdown?

The very fact that you measure your success "over" your colleagues to me highlights that at no point have you been working towards making a better world.. I mean its cool that you are an aspie and all but ts actually of not much use to the humanity.

Re: The annoying habits of highly effective people

#120
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>Being a CEO is hard Not necessarily. It completely depends on the company and the industry.

Unless your company is small, being a CEO is hard. Knowing about all projects and developments in the company (often several hundred projects and initiatives) and deciding on which opportunities to take is not an easy job.

Even when your company is small. I mean just the emotional pressure alone, you're still responsible for the well-being of however many employees you have, in addition to your own.

No wonder a lot of top level executives are psychopaths, the emotional detachment must really help.

Post reply on HN