Earlier quoted context omitted.
tell these guys that too: https://www.netflix.com/ca/title/80171742
They are profiting on your delusions.
I paid nothing to see it.
21–25 of 25 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would be easier to take this article seriously if: 1) The author didn’t misspell the names of the people he’s talking about. It’s George Filer. (“Filir”? Really?) Also, Ed Snowden, not “Snowdon.” 2) The author didn’t denigrate witnesses of significant stature who would be trusted as impeccable sources if they offered opinions on something other than UFOs (multiple NASA astronauts, highly placed intelligence offici…
Sure, copy the criticism of the comments and repost 'em here (Hah, he misspelled a name, therefore I am right, and he is wrong), and "impeccable sources"? Anecdotal is still anecdotal. 3. Bullshit and 4. Personal attack, classy Also, please address my points, instead of bashing exactly one of my mentioned source
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are profiting on your delusions.
please provide evidence debunking their testimonials. I paid nothing to see it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
please provide evidence debunking their testimonials. I paid nothing to see it.
Netflix isn't free, and testimonials are not evidence of anything. The idea that your reason is faulty is not a comfortable one. Believing in alien conspiracy theories is not rational.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Netflix isn't free, and testimonials are not evidence of anything. The idea that your reason is faulty is not a comfortable one. Believing in alien conspiracy theories is not rational.
please stop being patronizing. all you've done is attack my character.