Apollo 11 and Other Screw-Ups

I second your recommendation of Digital Apollo - an excellent book.

I also rate How Apollo Flew to the Moon by David Woods (Springer Praxis, 2011) very highly. The cover is kind of cheesy but its full of the kind of technical detail that is hard to find without reading through old NASA docs.

no not Buzz but he certainly did do a little more than hint there's something going on but he can't say it for obvious reasons.

If you look at NASA streams they 'randomly' experience technical issues but it's widely observed that this typically happens when a UFO is detected.

there's so much we don't know and are not being told but what is clear is this-extra terrestrials possess technology that far exceeds our own and possibly this dimension, and this scares the shit out of superpowers.

It's supported by the fact that there is so much fake UFO with very real ones (ex. US Navy f-18 video) so you can't claim what is real and what isn't.

Also this happened to USSR with their trip to the Phobos moon when the satellite all of sudden disappeared and there's captured photos showing what appears to be cylindrical objects. We can't send satellites there because they keep disappearing.

The real theory as to why we haven't been back on the moon is because the extra terrestrials that are supposedly mining on the moon will not allow weaponization of space. I know this is shocking but it's the most logical conclusion following the various "technical difficulties" during the live coverage of the moon landing.

20 years ago nobody listened to the theory that the government is snooping on everyone because it was too out there.

We have multiple witness accounts from credible backgrounds being demonized and outcasted as mentally ill.

This is the greatest trick they pull. I mean look around, what has changed after Snowden? Absolutely nothing because there's fuck all we can do about it when everybody is focused on the carrot on the end of the stick.

tell these guys that too: https://www.netflix.com/ca/title/80171742

Okay, I'll take a bite

> no not Buzz but he certainly did do a little more than hint there's something going on but he can't say it for obvious reasons.

He did not. If you mean his infamous quote about the monolith orbiting Phobos, he explicitly said it was a natural occurrence:

  There’s a monolith, a very unusual structure on this
  little potato-shaped object that goes around Mars once
  in every seven hours. They’re going to say,
  “Who put that there? Who put that there?”
  Well, the universe put it there.
  If you choose, God put it there.

As per the transcripts, Aldrin is 99.9% sure the "anomaly" was a panel floating around from the Apollo mission [2]

> there's so much we don't know and are not being told but what is clear is this-extra terrestrials possess technology that far exceeds our own and possibly this dimension, and this scares the shit out of superpowers.

Not understanding, nor possessing knowledge does NOT, in any way, give you a free pass to jump to conclusions… Missing information does not equate to it was aliens, that's just poor judgment and bad science.

> It's supported by the fact that there is so much fake UFO with very real ones (ex. US Navy f-18 video) so you can't claim what is real and what isn't.

What is supported? We don't know anything but it's extra terrestrial because of what? The incident described by you [3] concludes what exactly? Aliens? Seriously?

> Also this happened to USSR with their trip to the Phobos moon when the satellite all of sudden disappeared and there's captured photos showing what appears to be cylindrical objects. We can't send satellites there because they keep disappearing.

We can't even get a constant stream via satellite TV without interference.

> The real theory as to why we haven't been back on the moon is because the extra terrestrials that are supposedly mining on the moon will not allow weaponization of space. I know this is shocking but it's the most logical conclusion following the various "technical difficulties" during the live coverage of the moon landing.

Logical, how?

> We have multiple witness accounts from credible backgrounds being demonized and outcasted as mentally ill.

We have multiple accounts of credible people of nonsense, we call that anecdotal evidence.

> This is the greatest trick they pull. I mean look around, what has changed after Snowden? Absolutely nothing because there's fuck all we can do about it when everybody is focused on the carrot on the end of the stick.

Sure, pull in a totally unrelated conspiracy that turned out to be true and say "See, they were right, therefore I must be"

I am not even sure why I am responding, none of this is even worth of a reply, all I hope is that someone, getting pulled into this nonsense takes a second look and judges more sceptically, instead of jumping to "We don't understand, it must be aliens and there is an elite that wants to BLAHBLAHBLAH"

Also, the "scripture" to the OP I am responding to is the "documentary" from ufologist Steven M. Greer, recently featured on Netflix called "Unacknowledged". I'd advise anyone who has seen the movie to look at this review[4], or watch it with a good sense of humor.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDIXvpjnRws

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubMJLO4xjMs

[3] https://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2017/12/19/ufo-departme...

[4] https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/unacknowledged-netflix-...

Sure, copy the criticism of the comments and repost 'em here (Hah, he misspelled a name, therefore I am right, and he is wrong), and "impeccable sources"? Anecdotal is still anecdotal. 3. Bullshit and 4. Personal attack, classy

Also, please address my points, instead of bashing exactly one of my mentioned source