Live data from Hacker News

Asian-American Students Suing Harvard Over Admissions Win Justice Dept. Support

nytimes.com

61–70 of 228 posts

Re: Asian-American Students Suing Harvard Over Admissions Win Justice Dept. Support

#61
post #15
post #7

This argument, while important, is the low hanging fruit of the affirmative action debate in my opinion. We would not need affirmative action if legacy based admissions wasn't so prevalent in top schools. We would not need affirmative action if every school district in America recieved proper funding to support teachers and enable smaller class sizes, test prep for students to take specialized exams, and after school…

But there's the rub: "We would not need affirmative action if [reality was different]." Ergo, we need affirmative action. That is not to say we shouldn't also put significant effort into eradicating institutional prejudices, eliminating poverty, and investing in all communities. However, that effort will take generations and may never fully succeed, which means affirmative action, in its various forms, is necessary t…

You could make it around parent's income level and the amount of funding per capita the graduating school district receives. It's probably a better determinant to help the people who are really in need and removes race from the equation.

Re: Asian-American Students Suing Harvard Over Admissions Win Justice Dept. Support

#62
post #7

This argument, while important, is the low hanging fruit of the affirmative action debate in my opinion. We would not need affirmative action if legacy based admissions wasn't so prevalent in top schools. We would not need affirmative action if every school district in America recieved proper funding to support teachers and enable smaller class sizes, test prep for students to take specialized exams, and after school…

The Justice Dept.'s issue however is not with affirmative action but whether Harvard's affirmative action policy/execution is lawful.

Re: Asian-American Students Suing Harvard Over Admissions Win Justice Dept. Support

#63
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But there's the rub: "We would not need affirmative action if [reality was different]." Ergo, we need affirmative action. That is not to say we shouldn't also put significant effort into eradicating institutional prejudices, eliminating poverty, and investing in all communities. However, that effort will take generations and may never fully succeed, which means affirmative action, in its various forms, is necessary t…

Trying to force the outcome of something is never going to work. We need to fix the pipeline.

Honest question: are there actually any long-term longitudinal studies of affirmative action that reasonably demonstrate it does or doesn't work? You seem to take it as a truism, but I'm not convinced that concerted after-the-fact addressing of symptoms is necessarily doomed to failure, pragmatically or generally speaking.

Re: Asian-American Students Suing Harvard Over Admissions Win Justice Dept. Support

#64
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "We would not need affirmative action if [reality was different]." > Ergo, we need affirmative action. Logical fallacy. "I have a good immune system, so I would not need medicine if I got a cold." Doesn't mean I need medicine right now, when I'm not sick at all. EDIT: The example seems to be confusing people, so here's a more formal explanation: if (reality is different) then not (we need affirmative action) Does n…

The inverse of your example sentence would be something like - "I don't have a good immune system, so I would need medicine if I got a cold" - which makes sense, and is analogous to "Reality is not different, so we do need affirmative action."

The inverse of a proposition is not logically entailed by the proposition itself. You're looking for the contrapositive, but the contrapositive of his example is "I need medicine if I got a cold, so I do not have a good immune system."

Re: Asian-American Students Suing Harvard Over Admissions Win Justice Dept. Support

#65
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Racsim is the systematic oppression of people. It's carried out in instutions, culture, and processes: individual people do not perform racsim. (Individuals can discriminate.) Racism depends on country / region. In the US, racism exits against black and brown people. It is a system set up for the benefit of white people. Your confusion comes from falsely equating racial discrimination and racism.

No. Racism is: "prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior"

Incorrect: you're probably grabbing the Webster dictionary definition. Which is made by white people. Your go to citing is an example of racsim: control the definitions to make everything better for white poeple (and make it seem like white people can be affected by racsim hah!).

This is probably the first time you've heard this fact: racism is systematic, instutionalized, collective, cultural, social oppression of people of color for the benefit of white people.

Re: Asian-American Students Suing Harvard Over Admissions Win Justice Dept. Support

#66
post #7

This argument, while important, is the low hanging fruit of the affirmative action debate in my opinion. We would not need affirmative action if legacy based admissions wasn't so prevalent in top schools. We would not need affirmative action if every school district in America recieved proper funding to support teachers and enable smaller class sizes, test prep for students to take specialized exams, and after school…

It's not mutually exclusive, and this particular issue isn't low hanging fruit. If anything, this is close to the debate on affirmative action as they come. Harvard, and universities in the US have biased admissions processes with Asian Americans that go beyond what affirmative action is supposed to accomplish.

Re: Asian-American Students Suing Harvard Over Admissions Win Justice Dept. Support

#67

A lot of commenters here are demonstrating that they do not understand the difference between racism and racial discrimination. Racsim is the systematic oppression of people. It's carried out in instutions, culture, and processes: individual people do not perform racsim. (Individuals can discriminate.) Racism depends on country / region. In the US, racism exits against black and brown people. It is a system set up fo…

Racism is a term which has become fairly muddy without a specific definition. You say it's the systematic oppression of people. Wikipedia says it's "the belief in the superiority of one race over another". Others say it's prejudice + power. We could go on for a while.

This arguing about what the word exactly means is a waste of time.

Re: Asian-American Students Suing Harvard Over Admissions Win Justice Dept. Support

#68

A lot of commenters here are demonstrating that they do not understand the difference between racism and racial discrimination. Racsim is the systematic oppression of people. It's carried out in instutions, culture, and processes: individual people do not perform racsim. (Individuals can discriminate.) Racism depends on country / region. In the US, racism exits against black and brown people. It is a system set up fo…

Who says racism exits ONLY against black and brown people? Historically, it has existed against Jews and Asians.

The admission policy of Harvard (an institution) has been used against Jews, now it is used against Asians. By your definition, it is racism.

Re: Asian-American Students Suing Harvard Over Admissions Win Justice Dept. Support

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your assumption is wrong. Even if there is no legacy based admissions, even if every school district in America received proper funding for everything, Black students will still have significantly low educational attainment and achievement. It is because the extremely high percentage of Black kids living under single parenthood family [1], and there is no educational / societal intervention can reverse its impact on…

> Your assumption is wrong Perhaps... > It is because the extremely high percentage of Black kids living under single parenthood family [1] This is wildly unsourced - what data do you have (ideally across nations/racial categories) for this?

Wildly unsourced? The person you're responding has a link right there in their comment with a government source.

Re: Asian-American Students Suing Harvard Over Admissions Win Justice Dept. Support

#70
post #7

This argument, while important, is the low hanging fruit of the affirmative action debate in my opinion. We would not need affirmative action if legacy based admissions wasn't so prevalent in top schools. We would not need affirmative action if every school district in America recieved proper funding to support teachers and enable smaller class sizes, test prep for students to take specialized exams, and after school…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN