"They caution the results are only in laboratory conditions and advise further research is needed to better understand the long-term health impact - the changes recorded took place only over 48 hours."
Are we supposed to look negatively upon this study because they say "more research is needed"? Sounds like good science to me.
If that's your version of "negative", then yes, we should look negatively on it.
But more correctly, we should look skeptically on it. Just like all other studies that haven't been replicated scientifically.