I made it public yesterday on https://fts.fail/
Good luck slaying that dragon though.
91–100 of 131 posts
I made it public yesterday on https://fts.fail/
Good luck slaying that dragon though.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The challenge is not building the search engine, it’s in building the index. That’s why google wants every drop of data
I've sometimes wondered whether it would work for a search engine to reduce the indexing problem by focusing more on quality than quantity. Rather than indexing everything in the universe and then trying to rank it, focus on maximizing ROI and keeping the aggregate quality of the corpus up by aggressively pruning low-quality paths up-front. In practice this might require splitting the difference between classic Yahoo…
Got zero relevant results. Not even sure how the results came back, as the words weren’t in there. Tried “Taoist tai chi,” then “Taoism”. Love the ambition, but a long way to go go.
Thank you and sorry about that. Feel free to submit a suitable page about taoism.
I think it’s problematic to have random people submit to the index with no incentive. I’m just becoming interested in tai chi, but I run no such webpage (who usually submits). There might be a way to gamify or otherwise incentivize people, but that’s a very non-scalable approach. Really only automated crawling can be done to significantly widen your index. It’s just very resource intensive... but good luck! I hope you can go far!
Why would I use this over duckduckgo? (Assuming that we're some time on and the index is comparable?)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is a hack to have the desktop Altavista search tool index gopher... https://blog.benjojo.co.uk/post/building-a-search-engine-for... I've done it with a static set of data, the UTZoo Usenet data... http://altavista.superglobalmegacorp.com Shame it died on the vine, distributed, and curated search was a powerful tool in the days of Veronica and Archie
istributed, and curated search was a powerful tool in the days of Veronica and Archie No it wasn't. I'm old enough to have (tried to) use it, and it was terrible. It was usually quicker and got better results to manually connect to FTP sites, and run directory listing on likely directories untily ou found what you were looking for.