81–90 of 131 posts
Awesome, but man, that name really needs some work. It sounds like I'm asking a two-year-old whether he's been on the potty.
Awesome, but man, that name really needs some work. It sounds like I'm asking a two-year-old whether he's been on the potty.
And maybe also the 'you'?
"If you are willing and able to offer sponsorship, reach out to me at marcuslager at the biggest email provider in the world * dot com." Is that still yahoo.com?
The index is super tiny. A search for "the" got 112 results. Seems like a quick way to explore the entire index. Also it indexes pages twice if you submit them twice, so that needs to be fixed. But for some crazy reason, I kinda like this. It feels like the 90s internet. The links included so far have that same random mix of lots of nerdy links, homepages & personal blogs, a few religious sites, and the occasional bi…
This thing isn't slaying anything.
The index is super tiny. A search for "the" got 112 results. Seems like a quick way to explore the entire index. Also it indexes pages twice if you submit them twice, so that needs to be fixed. But for some crazy reason, I kinda like this. It feels like the 90s internet. The links included so far have that same random mix of lots of nerdy links, homepages & personal blogs, a few religious sites, and the occasional bi…
I was really confused by this too. I searched a Steam, Twitch and a bunch of other sites and it didn't find any of them. Then I did Youtube and it took 12 seconds (following queries were fast, I guess I was the first to search Youtube). This thing isn't slaying anything.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm glad I could make you curious about this. I will gladly expand on the documentation around the language model and querying as soon as I can. In broad terms: its a 16-bit vector space in which you can encode anything you like. I have chosen to encode phrases and words as bags-of-characters. This separates terms from each other enough that they can be searched for reliably (in almost all cases). Terms that share a…
Could the bags-of-characters approach cause issues with anagrams having the same vector? It would be surprising (to me) to get the same results for e.g. "strange" and "garnets".
A secondary index might become needed with the most popular terms, to resolve which anagram is the right one.
Got zero relevant results. Not even sure how the results came back, as the words weren’t in there. Tried “Taoist tai chi,” then “Taoism”. Love the ambition, but a long way to go go.
I tried emailing you at hotmail, but you are over the 1MB limit.
Reminds me of http://wiby.me
I like the "Surprise Me" button, where it takes you to a random page from the index. (I got a 90s era Babylon 5 fan page.) It could be interesting if didyougogo added that, but it would need to add a NSFW filter.