Live data from Hacker News

Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 26 posts

Re: Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?

#14

Probably same reason you dont need to see video of the food in a restaurant or video of your room in a hotel.

Idk about that. If I could see in video that the dish waiters bring to table actually look like the pictures it would be more enticing. Also, just getting the vibe, feel, and size of a restaurant or hotel could have a big influence.

Re: Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?

#17

Transpose videos to gifs with audio and I think you will have something. No one does it with raw video because of the hosting cost.

>Transpose videos to gifs with audio and I think you will have something. No one does it with raw video because of the hosting cost

Umm, you do realize that videos provide a way better compression than GIF+audio, right?

Re: Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?

#18

Bash out an MVP and get a few people to try it. Tinder is vulnerable to a strong competitor I think its a reasonable idea and you never can tell what the customer really wants or what the market will reward.

The technical part is the easy part. What’s interesting to me is how tinder, which unlike twitter or Instagram for example requires a certain mass of active users in the same physical area, established themeselves in the first place.

My only thought on how to make a “Tinder of X” is start hyper local, somewhere like a college campus or a single neighborhood. The small local userbase could well become a selling point too, giving the product the image of exclusivity. Starting hyper local also may help with the “ok so he looks cute but what if he’s actually an axe murderer or Russian troll” problem.

Post reply on HN