Mmhh..looks like there still _is_ Chatroulette (NSFW!) https://chatroulette.com
Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?
11–20 of 26 posts
Re: Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?
#12Re: Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?
#13Re: Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?
#14Probably same reason you dont need to see video of the food in a restaurant or video of your room in a hotel.
Re: Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?
#15Re: Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?
#16Re: Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?
#17Transpose videos to gifs with audio and I think you will have something. No one does it with raw video because of the hosting cost.
Umm, you do realize that videos provide a way better compression than GIF+audio, right?
Re: Is anyone doing “Tinder, but with video”? Why not?
#18Bash out an MVP and get a few people to try it. Tinder is vulnerable to a strong competitor I think its a reasonable idea and you never can tell what the customer really wants or what the market will reward.
My only thought on how to make a “Tinder of X” is start hyper local, somewhere like a college campus or a single neighborhood. The small local userbase could well become a selling point too, giving the product the image of exclusivity. Starting hyper local also may help with the “ok so he looks cute but what if he’s actually an axe murderer or Russian troll” problem.