Live data from Hacker News

Slack Is Buying HipChat from Atlassian

bloomberg.com

71–80 of 730 posts

Re: Slack Is Buying HipChat from Atlassian

#71
post #22

What options are left for self-hosted chat systems with comparable features? We've been using self-hosted Hipchat at our company and there is zero chance we will ever use a cloud solution.

Out of interest, why would you guys never use a cloud solution? Sensitive conversations? Server reliability?

Management doesn't trust externally-hosted solutions with our IP. This expands beyond chat applications as well.

Re: Slack Is Buying HipChat from Atlassian

#72
post #4

Am I the only one who sees this as anti-competitive? This is basically collusion - Atlassian agreeing not to compete in chat in return for a payment from Slack. It almost seems like we're intent on making literally every mistake we made with traditional businesses, but with electronic products.

I imagine there's some observation bias here, but aren't there other enterprise chat apps out there in the market?

Like if my neighbors and coworkers and friends use Slack, I'm not sure if they're a proxy of the entire market.

The reason I say that is because there are other apps that do similar things that hail from Microsoft, Google and Facebook.

Then the retort goes: well they don't do integrations and aren't as developer focused as Slack and Hipchat.

Then, naturally, wouldn't that incentivize those other apps already in the market to build out those features, and do it better?

Re: Slack Is Buying HipChat from Atlassian

#74
post #26

I've never really gotten into any of Atlasssian's products. It seems like they make tools for managers with bolt on functionality for engineers (which may be why I never caught onto their products). I hope this is good news for Slack, but as a software engineer today, Atlasssian's products are not the first ones I would recommend in any category.

What would you recommend instead of Jira?

What is the problem you're trying to solve?

Re: Slack Is Buying HipChat from Atlassian

#77
post #26

I've never really gotten into any of Atlasssian's products. It seems like they make tools for managers with bolt on functionality for engineers (which may be why I never caught onto their products). I hope this is good news for Slack, but as a software engineer today, Atlasssian's products are not the first ones I would recommend in any category.

What would you recommend instead of Jira?

Stick to github issues or similar. Whatever is closer to the real work and gives you the biggest bang for the buck. Not the most wet dream. You do not need a gazillion of workflows and checks and stories and epics and boards etc. "Keep it simple, stupid"

Re: Slack Is Buying HipChat from Atlassian

#78
Tangentially related, recently Google pushed an ad for chat.google.com my way (in a Gmail popup no less). It seems they made a Slack competitor, it sort of uses Hangouts for one-on-one chats but its own thing for groups (and groups from Hangouts don't show up there) and broke Hangouts in Gmail since then (some conversation where the other person wrote the last message shows as unread the next time I open gmail).

Re: Slack Is Buying HipChat from Atlassian

#79
post #66

Well, thanks to this today I learned that Microsoft had a product called Teams. I didn't see anybody using it but I saw plenty of people using Slack. Maybe is Team addressed to big companies? My customers are all medium or small. Does anyone here have some experience using Teams? Is it really in competition with Slack?

Teams is bundled into Office365, so if you use that for email or Office software, you've got it for free.

It's exactly the same product as Slack, almost carbon copy.

Re: Slack Is Buying HipChat from Atlassian

#80
post #4

Am I the only one who sees this as anti-competitive? This is basically collusion - Atlassian agreeing not to compete in chat in return for a payment from Slack. It almost seems like we're intent on making literally every mistake we made with traditional businesses, but with electronic products.

I mean this without being tongue in cheek, but Teams itself is anti-competitive. It's a horrible product which is basically only in use because it's bundled into Office 365. Absolutely nothing in Teams is not done better in other products, including Microsoft's own products such as Skype for Business or plain old Skype.

Business chats in general are just completely incongruent with what users are expecting from end-user chats like Telegram or WhatsApp or Messages. Even Google has fallen far behind with regards to Hangouts, and Allo is not a good answer either. From a business perspective, I get why businesses choose Teams or Allo, but the actual products have usability as an incidental feature. With both major players, the chats are just there to ensure that Slack cannot/will not grow, same with other programs such as Discord. It's a revenue stream that is yet untapped, and soon Microsoft and Google will come calling for their payment from Businesses.

Post reply on HN