Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why conquer when you can invest? They're investing. It's working. We're happy to have chinese investment in all spaces, ag, and mining, we buy the goods and we sell the dairy produce. The real threat is Tasmania: haven't you seen the wargames maps? We need those US-Chinese troops to fight back against the daemon armies from cradle mountain.
Investment doesn't buy you all the 'Living Space' you may want
The Chinese Government Likely Borrowed More than the US in 2017
21–30 of 159 posts
Re: The Chinese Government Likely Borrowed More than the US in 2017
#22And this is the deficit we know about. In reality it could be much larger, something like 1000% of GDP. The situation is the same with China’s military budget. In reality it’s probably 2x or 3x larger than the official numbers we have.
China's GDP is probably 10% of what they reported.
Re: The Chinese Government Likely Borrowed More than the US in 2017
#23Re: The Chinese Government Likely Borrowed More than the US in 2017
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Endure the bubble, until you can conquer Australia and relieve the pressure
Then they'll get 2 additional armies every single turn! And a territory card!
Re: The Chinese Government Likely Borrowed More than the US in 2017
#25Re: The Chinese Government Likely Borrowed More than the US in 2017
#26And this is the deficit we know about. In reality it could be much larger, something like 1000% of GDP. The situation is the same with China’s military budget. In reality it’s probably 2x or 3x larger than the official numbers we have.
China's GDP is probably 10% of what they reported.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nomi...
Re: The Chinese Government Likely Borrowed More than the US in 2017
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then they'll get 2 additional armies every single turn! And a territory card!
What is the reference here ? Is it the same reference as neighbour comment about Tasmania and daemon armies ?
the other reference is to turn-by-turn games of war on maps (I think)
Re: The Chinese Government Likely Borrowed More than the US in 2017
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
China's GDP is probably 10% of what they reported.
No, it seems to be the other way around. China's GDP figures are definitely false but likely to be inflated, not suppressed.
> other way around ... likely to be inflated, not suppressed.
If their GDP is actually 10% of what they report, then the reports are inflated.
Re: The Chinese Government Likely Borrowed More than the US in 2017
#29Re: The Chinese Government Likely Borrowed More than the US in 2017
#30In economic terms, how is this sustainable?
Broadly, constant borrowing is sustainable, just look at any European economy. As long as your tax base grows faster than your interest payments there’s no unavoidable problem. This? It’s not sustainable. Sooner or later this will result in a correction. This could range from aggressive budgetary measures, an internal crisis all the way to China monetising its overseas investments (which are extremely extensive).