Live data from Hacker News

Amazon, the Brand Buster

nytimes.com

71–80 of 123 posts

Re: Amazon, the Brand Buster

#71
post #60

I'm a little surprised so many people still buy large numbers of alkaline batteries. NiMH rechargeables are readily available, have a fairly low cost to get started with a battery/charger bundle, save a significant amount of money over time and have vastly better performance in higher-drain devices like cameras and flashlights.

I'm more surprised on the front that I essentially own nothing now that uses regular batteries. Even my TV remote is recharged by plugging in a USB cable.

Re: Amazon, the Brand Buster

#72
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Commingled inventory is an option for FBA sellers. You can disable it easily from your FBA account; I think at this point the "problem" is only for beginning sellers who aren't aware that it's on by default

As sibling comments pointed out, the main problem is for the manufacturer/brand and for the buyer. An unscrupulous seller (of, for example, couterfeits) would benefit significantly and so would not disable the option. That Amazon themselves don't disable this option (for "shipped and sold by Amazon.com"), except, effectively, for their own brand, is the suspect anti-competitive practice.

Amazon also has something called Brand Registry. Essentially, if you can prove you own a brand, you can prevent other sellers from selling the same item. That's how most larger brands protect their listings.

Re: Amazon, the Brand Buster

#73
post #71
post #60

I'm a little surprised so many people still buy large numbers of alkaline batteries. NiMH rechargeables are readily available, have a fairly low cost to get started with a battery/charger bundle, save a significant amount of money over time and have vastly better performance in higher-drain devices like cameras and flashlights.

I'm more surprised on the front that I essentially own nothing now that uses regular batteries. Even my TV remote is recharged by plugging in a USB cable.

Probably a non-user-serviceable Li-ion. I dislike that trend, especially when there are Li-ions in standard cylindrical form factors that could be just as easily changed as AA or AAA.

Possible counterpoint: getting a Li-ion 14500 confused with a AA and putting it in an incompatible device is bad.

Re: Amazon, the Brand Buster

#74

As someone who almost always buys generic brand from wherever I shop I'm pretty aloof to these complaints. Target, Walmart, and Costco all have in house brands. The Amazon brand "Goodthreads" Oxfords I wear to the office are very impressively well made for the price. Compared to the Target "Goodfellow & Co" ones at the same price there's a higher level of quality and finish. They're better than the Banana Republic on…

I always do that with toilet paper, soap, etc. If Amazon kills brands, that is a great thing.

If you need to wear expensive clothing to show how rich you are, donate 10k to the top ranked give well charity, buy a five dollar t-shirt and I will sew your reciept on it. Much more efficent than throwing more money on Raulph Lauren.

Re: Amazon, the Brand Buster

#76
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As sibling comments pointed out, the main problem is for the manufacturer/brand and for the buyer. An unscrupulous seller (of, for example, couterfeits) would benefit significantly and so would not disable the option. That Amazon themselves don't disable this option (for "shipped and sold by Amazon.com"), except, effectively, for their own brand, is the suspect anti-competitive practice.

Amazon also has something called Brand Registry. Essentially, if you can prove you own a brand, you can prevent other sellers from selling the same item. That's how most larger brands protect their listings.

If that works, then why hasn't Apple done it and ended the scrounge of fake chargers?

EDIT: Or Anker for that matter. Anker is a better example because their main business is chargers/batteries, so the should care a lot about branding and making sure there are no fake chargers under their name.

Re: Amazon, the Brand Buster

#77
post #60

I'm a little surprised so many people still buy large numbers of alkaline batteries. NiMH rechargeables are readily available, have a fairly low cost to get started with a battery/charger bundle, save a significant amount of money over time and have vastly better performance in higher-drain devices like cameras and flashlights.

Most of the devices that I use batteries for are not high drain, not even my flashlights (because LEDs). I would prefer always having a stack of batteries to having to buy more (because they are always in use) and remember which are charged.

My camera, laptop, smartphone, kindle, etc all have their own rechargable battery, so what is left is mostly my Ikea tradlos, kitchen scale and car keys (plus associated stuff that i forget and which therefore can be assumed not to need all that much recharging) which all runs on the super small batteries (2032? 3220? something like that), that I haven't seen as a rechargeable model.

No doubt this will change with kids, but until I have them they won't matter.

Re: Amazon, the Brand Buster

#78
post #60

I'm a little surprised so many people still buy large numbers of alkaline batteries. NiMH rechargeables are readily available, have a fairly low cost to get started with a battery/charger bundle, save a significant amount of money over time and have vastly better performance in higher-drain devices like cameras and flashlights.

I've tried using rechargeables a few times and it never works out over the long-term. They get thrown away by people who don't realize they are rechargeable, you end up with one less than you need, you forget to charge them, it's just a pain compared to having a supply of disposable batteries that have a good shelf life and are always ready to use

Re: Amazon, the Brand Buster

#79
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those are not identical items. Look at the photos: the one sold on Amazon is much smaller.

Oh sorry, the Aliexpress listing includes quite a few variants and the one I was referring to apparently isn't selected by default. The one on the far left is the same as the Amazon listing. But the point is, search for any popular product category on both sites and you will see largely the same items, with Amazon typically somewhere from 2-5x as expensive.

[deleted]

Re: Amazon, the Brand Buster

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Receiving a counterfeit item must happen so very rarely, considering the (millions?) huge volume of these sales per day, and Amazon is obviously swift to fix the issue (much to the chagrin of sellers swept up by the zero tolerance rule) that I really doubt most consumers would ever receive a counterfeit item in this way. It seems more likely that consumers would buy the "cheaper" option from an FBA seller (perhaps un…

Or it’s a counterfeit charger that fries their $2500 laptop.

Or burns down the house. (This may be worse with batteries than chargers, but both can be a fire hazard)
Post reply on HN