Multinational companies took the wind out of the sails for most IT companies's ability to hire talent. Around 2008, there was a peak boom in offshore centers set up by most companies. These companies could afford to pay well because most of their revenue is either ad revenue or from companies like Microsoft which had a great sales pipeline going. These companies around 2014 - 2015 started to cut down heavily on offsh…
Almost univesally, during that period the response I received from our customers was that outsourcing was cheaper, but quality was so bad they hired stateside as soon as the contracts were up.
The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
31–40 of 429 posts
Re: The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ok generalization again, but I see a lot more Indian names asking questions rather than answering them.
Nothing wrong with asking questions and seeking to learn.
Re: The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
#33Re: The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
#34A company will outsource because it’s cheaper, in the short term at least. But an outsourcer runs on billable hours, so they are disincentivised to automate repetitive tasks. So here’s the new competition: outsourcer who can do the job for 1/10th the cost, or In-house engineers with advanced automation who can do 100x the work at the same cost. It’s not about West vs India, it’s about business models.
That's definitely the issue here.
As an engineer , you are usually trained to automate as much as your work as possible , and we create framework for that.
Outsourcer won't , or will not tell you about it because they need to charge you money for it.
At some point , it's very likely that India will suffer the same crisis as China labour from automation.
Re: The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
#35Re: The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Indian engineers are street smart If we are going to generalize, I would have to say the exact opposite. In my experience they are definitely smart and capable, but usually extremely naive and somewhat sheltered by western standards.
Yeah. My generalization is of no use in a discussion. I only meant to say a lot of them(that I know) are. I can't vouch for billions of us :-) Could you elaborate "sheltered by western standards"?
Until it explodes and escalates all the way to the top.
Re: The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Indian engineers are street smart If we are going to generalize, I would have to say the exact opposite. In my experience they are definitely smart and capable, but usually extremely naive and somewhat sheltered by western standards.
Yeah. My generalization is of no use in a discussion. I only meant to say a lot of them(that I know) are. I can't vouch for billions of us :-) Could you elaborate "sheltered by western standards"?
I.e. not only "you get what you pay for" in the sense that cheap labour might not be the most skilled labour, but in the deeper sense in that if the outsourcing scenario is such that the western company orders a bunch of stuff from a checklist done, well, that's what's going to get done.
This is the same problem a large organization has locally too, but it gets amplified when you try to outsource things and increase turn-around time.
Re: The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
#38A company will outsource because it’s cheaper, in the short term at least. But an outsourcer runs on billable hours, so they are disincentivised to automate repetitive tasks. So here’s the new competition: outsourcer who can do the job for 1/10th the cost, or In-house engineers with advanced automation who can do 100x the work at the same cost. It’s not about West vs India, it’s about business models.
Re: The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
#39The problem is that only the top 10% of Indian programmers are in the top ten percent.
Re: The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
#40A company will outsource because it’s cheaper, in the short term at least. But an outsourcer runs on billable hours, so they are disincentivised to automate repetitive tasks. So here’s the new competition: outsourcer who can do the job for 1/10th the cost, or In-house engineers with advanced automation who can do 100x the work at the same cost. It’s not about West vs India, it’s about business models.
> they are disincentivised to automate repetitive tasks That's definitely the issue here. As an engineer , you are usually trained to automate as much as your work as possible , and we create framework for that. Outsourcer won't , or will not tell you about it because they need to charge you money for it. At some point , it's very likely that India will suffer the same crisis as China labour from automation.
Is China really suffering that crisis? I have the impression that they focused early enough on high-tech industries and that the increasing wealth (leading to higher cost) drives more manual labour away than automation.