Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft acquires Github

blogs.microsoft.com

221–230 of 840 posts

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#221
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Remember that _GitHub used to be profitable_. Then they took $250m in investment and became unprofitable.

And that was three years ago. So what’s the point of outrage now?

I guess it's a great example of why taking funding can be bad, depending on what your goals are.

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#222
post #10

"When it comes to our commitment to open source, judge us by the actions we have taken in the recent past, our actions today, and in the future." How is that patent extortion going then? Still earning you money? Any plans to stop in "the near future"? Didn't think so. I'm sure Microsoft will improve github. Just like it improved skype.

So which company would you rather buy Github? GitHub wasn't profitable. Would you rather it just disappear?

> So which company would you rather buy Github?

None.

It could be run as a public utility or it could be turned into something federated to absorb the bulk of the hosting costs.

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#224
post #152
post #108

GitHub - $160M Recurring Revenue in 2016... sometimes I am amazed how they got to the $7.5B figures. I wonder what happen to Atom Editor. Although I think most are using Visual Studio Code anyway, so may be it make sense to marge the man power. I wonder if they would make Coding ( Visual Studio Code ), Code Hosting ( GitHub ), Deploy ( Azure ) all seamless. Surely now Microsoft has the incentive to make Ruby Rails a…

When Microsoft sets it mind on buying a company, they're willing to pay almost anything. Remember when they wanted to pay $45 billion for Yahoo only a decade ago? Companies that are exploring the option of selling to Microsoft know this quite well, and they exploit it to the fullest.

That included the Alibaba (including the percentage sold off since) and Yahoo Japan stakes. It would’ve made them good money buying Yahoo at that price.

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’ll see the same thing with Google. I’ve found quite a few Google shills on here

Well yes, they all have huge com departments with people creating accounts and maintaining it for years to get organic reputations. We stopped trusting TV and starting trusting each other more. So they started disguising as us. It's the natural evolution.

Agree, hard to distinguish people from ads these days

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#226

People keep mentioning how "Microsoft changed" due to VS Code, the Linux subsystem, .NET Core. I say that they are the same company, only with different cash cows. Haven't they spied on Windows 10 users? Do they not engage in patents racketeering? Haven't they killed Nokia and ruined Skype? " But Mom, some of the other companies are doing it too ", well yeah, but some of us don't have double standards, in spite of wh…

Microsoft hasn't changed at all. Here is one recent incident I read: https://twitter.com/jamiebuilds/status/1002696910266773505

[deleted]

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#227

People keep mentioning how "Microsoft changed" due to VS Code, the Linux subsystem, .NET Core. I say that they are the same company, only with different cash cows. Haven't they spied on Windows 10 users? Do they not engage in patents racketeering? Haven't they killed Nokia and ruined Skype? " But Mom, some of the other companies are doing it too ", well yeah, but some of us don't have double standards, in spite of wh…

Why not let things play out a little before predicting chaos? Github doesn't have the vendor lock-in that other companies have. It starts to go downhill? Just push your repo to another Git host. Yes, you'll need to figure out how to port some of your workflows, but it won't be an insurmountable pain.

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#229
post #17
post #2

Satya Nadela's done differently to his predecessors, maybe this will go well. I understand the concern of a few companies dominating everything that we use, but time will tell.

I wonder what people would have thought if Github had just disappeared instead of selling to Microsoft? I mean I understand some concern, but this can really only be a good thing for Github in the long run. It isn't like Microsoft was producing a competitor and just bought them to kill them. Honestly, I like this better than Amazon or Google buying them.

That definitely wasn't the only alternative.

The reason this happened is to get a payday for the investors. I'm happy they invested, but when you look at GitHub it is a utility, not a commercial enterprise and should be treated like public transport rather than like an oil company.

Re: Microsoft acquires Github

#230

People keep mentioning how "Microsoft changed" due to VS Code, the Linux subsystem, .NET Core. I say that they are the same company, only with different cash cows. Haven't they spied on Windows 10 users? Do they not engage in patents racketeering? Haven't they killed Nokia and ruined Skype? " But Mom, some of the other companies are doing it too ", well yeah, but some of us don't have double standards, in spite of wh…

Yep, I really dont understand why there are Microsoft fans. Like I understand if you bought an Xbox, but I dont understand if you are a programmer. Microsoft has always been a headache. Recently its been a tiny bit better, but they still are a for-profit company that needs to continue to make a profit. This was to make Microsoft money, nothing to 'help programmers'.

I don't know what the term "Microsoft Fan" means, but count me a proud C#, VSCode, Visual Studio, and even VBScript fan.
Post reply on HN