It's not economic. People have been poor for hundreds and thousands and millions of years, and yet they still had children.
The birthrate in the U.S. is the lowest it’s been in 30 years
31–40 of 134 posts
Re: The birthrate in the U.S. is the lowest it’s been in 30 years
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
If anyone else was curious what SMV means in this comment it seems to be Sexual Market Value. It’s a term used amongst red pill/incel and such communities.
incel = Involuntarily Celibate.
What's red pill?
Also, how does the 'Nu male' relates to, or is different from an incel dude?
Re: The birthrate in the U.S. is the lowest it’s been in 30 years
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
It was also used by the pick up artist communities before that too. Basically anyone who studies modern human sexuality. But hey, write me off as a Incel or whatever you want. All non feminist men are toxic, right?
The pick up artist community seems fairly toxic..
Re: The birthrate in the U.S. is the lowest it’s been in 30 years
#34We make just enough to have a really good life without kids or have a really stressful life with them. We don’t even have a house yet (and I mostly don’t want one, but that’s another conversation). I ran the numbers, and I didn’t like the outcome.
Everyone that I know that has kids is sleep deprived, unable to do much of anything outside of the house and are in a lot of debt. Some people think that kids make up for all of that. Not us.
Re: The birthrate in the U.S. is the lowest it’s been in 30 years
#35There were a couple points in there that could, may, should have been left on the cutting room floor. Some good points were made however. Social Security in its original Ponzi-Schemesque form will end up even worse for wear with declining birthrates. (Not saying Social Security is bad in concept, but it only works in times of sharp population growth, and even then, banking on the youth to carry you just because seems…
Social Security works with economic growth. It doesn't matter if you get 10 babies or 10 robots. Automation makes possible to keep proper living standards without exponential population growth.
Social Security, as other services like education, stops working because it is not shared.
Actually, with enough automation, it is easier to satisfy a smaller population.
There are 3.5 million professional truck drivers in the United States. Self-driving trucks mean that you need 3.5 million fewer babies to carry out that task. Just 3 million if you actually need 500,000 people to maintain the software.
So, I agree with you that in the past Social Security was depending on population growth. That has been changing fast for the past 50 years. There is no economical reason to not have Social Security in the future.
Re: The birthrate in the U.S. is the lowest it’s been in 30 years
#36People are watching us constantly, everyone has more-or-less enough food, there's a ton of shiny stuff and panda tasks in the enclosure, there's nasty loud machines everywhere, and if you have some young they're like this tiny very-vulnerable creature who will be shortly moved to a different enclosure to be watched by different creatures.
May not be economic!!
Re: The birthrate in the U.S. is the lowest it’s been in 30 years
#37It's not economic. People have been poor for hundreds and thousands and millions of years, and yet they still had children.
Once people can choose to not children, factors like the economy affect population growth.
Re: The birthrate in the U.S. is the lowest it’s been in 30 years
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is on the mind of every young person. It is becoming more common to do everything on your own. You cannot rely on a good partner to share and build a life together with. The traditional routes and social contract are broken. That is why many young people are listening to lectures on youtube and voted for nationalism. But hey, downvote me into oblivion and ridicule me, I could care less. Just sharing my insights an…
I notice that a lot of your comments are declared as absolute truths, often applying to large demographics, without much to back those claims up. It feels like you've got strong opinions (that's perfectly okay!) and think your view of the world is shared by many / most other people (this, not so much).
Re: The birthrate in the U.S. is the lowest it’s been in 30 years
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Think it through though. It's easy to follow the bandwagon of guys that purport that life to be the solution (I read all this stuff too), and I thought it was too at some point. I think you should go taste that lifestyle, but I think you'd find it to be only a short term fix and the same sort of "trap" awaiting you at the end. The solution to just simply arm yourself with all the knowledge you can, and then embark on…
Much appreciated man. Yeah, I have been doing the digital nomad lifestyle and lived abroad for a few weeks at a time for the past five years. I do see the trap that befalls most expats and am aware of risks. The months that I spend abroad are the happiest time of my life, when I come back to the states and can't get a date, am told I am toxic and a potential rapist and have to live in a city where homelessness is spi…
Re: The birthrate in the U.S. is the lowest it’s been in 30 years
#40Isn't just economic, methinks: Millennials also tend to be more perceptive about the costs of overpopulation and the approach of global warming. The wisdom of Small Is Beautiful is not so lost on them.
Speak for yourself. I'm petrified by the prospect of lack of growth. It is what our economy is built on, and a larger population could result in better science. There is plenty of land in the United States. Even our cities in the rust belt are underpopulated.