Earlier quoted context omitted.
Indeed. I don't get it why `ip` has -brief which is not a default behavior and why -verbose flag does not exist. Also there could be a -no-color instead of -color flag.
Or simply detect when piped and leave the color out, as just about every sane cli tool does it.
There are real reasons for Linux to replace ifconfig, netstat, etc
191–200 of 270 posts
Re: There are real reasons for Linux to replace ifconfig, netstat, etc
#192TIL: iproute2 has a color, a brief/human mode, and a one-line mode. I think I am going to be aliasing ip -color to ip from now on. $ ip -br -c a # ip -brief -color address lo UNKNOWN 127.0.0.1/8 ::1/128 eth0 DOWN wlan0 UP 192.0.2.1/24 2001:db8::1/64 fe80::1/64 $ ip -br -c l # ip -brief -color link lo UNKNOWN 00:00:00:00:00:00 eth0 DOWN 00:12:34:56:78:9a wlan0 UP 12:34:56:78:9a:bc
Option "-br" is unknown, try "ip -help".
Friggin' RHEL I guess I'll have to check back in a couple of years.
Re: There are real reasons for Linux to replace ifconfig, netstat, etc
#193I've lost much muscle memory and skill with newer systems. When I was younger I had time for deep dives into configs/manuals/googles/mailthreads. These days my job assumes I know all the stuff and ins and outs, not having a good time re-learning everything I already know how to do... It's not new anymore and gives no joy for learning new things, no time to do it either. It sucks.
Yeah I don’t buy into the idea that because there were some under-the-hood changes that had to be made, that means the whole application has to be thrown away and a new interface re-written. I don’t believe for a second that these developers couldn’t have dropped in a new backend and mapped the same commands to it. Putting a shinier coat of paint on the command line isn’t going to attract a wider audience, it’s just…
At the end of the day, it's fine though. It'll either satisfy the needs of people and become a new standard or it will be satisfy edge cases and become the new thing that needs to be deprecated because no-one contributes to the project and the original maintainer has lost interest.
Re: There are real reasons for Linux to replace ifconfig, netstat, etc
#194ifc TAB ENTER is just so much faster then ip addr.
"ip a" will be matched the same as "ip addr" or "ip address"
Learning that made me much more accepting of the new command
Re: There are real reasons for Linux to replace ifconfig, netstat, etc
#195Re: There are real reasons for Linux to replace ifconfig, netstat, etc
#196I'm trying hard to fight my old muscle memory to use ip instead of ifconfig on Linux. I have a few issues though: * "ip" is useless as a keyword if you're looking for help online. It's extremely frustrating and probably my main issue actually learning how to use the damn thing. * ifconfig's output is simply more readable IMO: https://svkt.org/~simias/up/20180525-113825_ip-vs-ifconfig.p... . It's pretty weird that a b…
Re: There are real reasons for Linux to replace ifconfig, netstat, etc
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly. Even the `ip` name is misleading as the command does much more than only ip-related things (link layer, network namespaces, tcp, …).
Always wondered about this - is IP 'internet protocol' or something else, since it's much lower level than IP? I've been using IP route 15 for 15, maybe 20 years now and hinestly have no idea.
Re: There are real reasons for Linux to replace ifconfig, netstat, etc
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
You do realize Solaris implemented a service management system (which is also superior to systemd; and was also created prior to systemd's conception), right ? They switched away from legacy SysV init scripts BEFORE systemd existed.
SMF was quite nice. Solaris was incredible in a lot of ways. I always wonder why it never took off.
Because Larry Ellison bought Sun.
Re: There are real reasons for Linux to replace ifconfig, netstat, etc
#199I'm trying hard to fight my old muscle memory to use ip instead of ifconfig on Linux. I have a few issues though: * "ip" is useless as a keyword if you're looking for help online. It's extremely frustrating and probably my main issue actually learning how to use the damn thing. * ifconfig's output is simply more readable IMO: https://svkt.org/~simias/up/20180525-113825_ip-vs-ifconfig.p... . It's pretty weird that a b…
ifconfig -L
(I don't know if this is already taken. I haven't read the man pages in forever.)Re: There are real reasons for Linux to replace ifconfig, netstat, etc
#200When I started learning Linux when it was, I think, 0.99, I appreciated that so many commands where cross-Unix. It was a Unix lookalike. I could watch how something is done on one Unix, type this stuff into my Linux terminal, and get an equivalent result in Linux, and this helped a lot and created a sense of community. Now I see that Linux tears the standards apart, there are more and more obstacles with porting comp…
Yup, you could say that again. I cut my teeth in Linux while in high school for the most path. First year of college, I go to the engineering labs to get a job, it's all SunOS/Solaris. It's like driving a car! There were very few commands that were different! Now, Linux is slowly going rouge and changing everything in the supposedly name of "progress" I'm still salty as hell with the systemd rubbish. The problem is t…
I would imagine that there are a few others in the thread that read this article and felt similar.