Live data from Hacker News

Can Things Be Both Popular and Silenced?

slatestarcodex.com

31–40 of 79 posts

Re: Can Things Be Both Popular and Silenced?

#31
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Our culture as produced in books/film/tv/music is dominated by left leaning beliefs. This could either be a conspiracy comprising of every author of every medium... OR It's because stories need sympathetic characters, and current Republican values aren't sympathetic. I'm not trying to be divisive or flippant, though I'm sure this will be the effect. But success in media is driven by believable sympathetic character…

> It's because stories need sympathetic characters, and current Republican values aren't sympathetic. What makes you think that?

His cognitive dissonance dehumanizing the 'opposition'.

Re: Can Things Be Both Popular and Silenced?

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'm pro stuff like basic income, but also against minimum wage It seems obvious to me that UBI is a replacement for minimum wage laws. Context: I'm anti-minimum wage laws, full stop, with or without UBI. I'm also pro-UBI [at around $500-800/mo/adult].

It doesn't to me tbf; UBI and no minimum wage means that employers are allowed to hire people for no wage. Then again, there's already loads of ways to get around minimum wage laws, see the gig industry, hospitality (e.g. anyone that depends on tips) industry, and prison labor (modern slavery).

> no minimum wage means that employers are allowed to hire people for no wage

With a backstop of "now you won't starve if you turn it down", that is much less problematic.

Today, if someone's skills only create $6 of value per hour, they are economically unemployable. With UBI and no minimum wage, someone could pay them $5/hr and both would be better off than today.

Re: Can Things Be Both Popular and Silenced?

#33
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, I do feel like my ideas/community are the underdog and I'm not even all that rightwing (I'm pro stuff like basic income, but also against minimum wage). The thing about underdog is this. Our culture as produced in books/film/tv/music is dominated by left leaning beliefs. If your conservate the media that naturally surrounds you does not reflect or celebrate your values. Though I'm not saying they don't exist.…

"Basically if there is an internet community that's not expressily rightwing, it's community will be leftwing, so leftwing people don't need a space for themselves" I'd argue the exact opposite. Most of the big internet forums, reddit, 4chan, gaming forums are all right leaning to greater or lesser degrees, and most of the smaller forums I've come across in many many years of wasted time on the internet follow this p…

The largest internet forum Reddit is ridiculously left leaning and the mods actively suppress conservative opinions. (1)

HN is left leaning, but I haven't seen any moderator action against right wing opinions. 2nd amendment rights posts used to eat a dozen downvotes each though.

(1) http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2016/12/02/social-media-site-red...

Re: Can Things Be Both Popular and Silenced?

#34
post #19

> But shutting up is of course is the exact opposite of what the people involved are doing – as the Times points out, several IDW members have audiences in the millions, monthly Patreon revenue in the five to six figures, and (with a big enough security detail) regular college speaking engagements. That's beside the point though, as I don't think the complain/claim is that they are silenced from everywhere and have n…

Misrepresentation is another way to silence someone, since you're not making that real person viewes visible, but some fictional, and obviously bad views. Happens a lot with Peterson, being called alt-right and all that. So many people believe this and take it from media misrepresentation.

Re: Can Things Be Both Popular and Silenced?

#35
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> America invades Iraq, slaughters a million people No they didn't. They were incredibly naive and thought that the Iraqis would jump for joy and become just like America when Saddam was taken out. Instead they decided to kill each other. > In the author's mind all of the fundamental, "Orthodox" institutions are controlled by liberals who control the "airwaves and pulpits and universities." Are you suggesting the med…

> No they didn't. Yes, it's all the Iraqis fault. And I'm sure you sincerely believe that despite it being utterly insane. > Are you suggesting the media, hollywood, and universities aren't left-leaning? Ironically, you've aptly demonstrated the entire point. If you asked this question to most people outside of America (you know, the other 7.3 billion people on the planet) I think many would probably agree that no, A…

The universities are so far left there's a university ethics professor who smashed an alt right protester's skull in with a bike lock.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2017/05...

Re: Can Things Be Both Popular and Silenced?

#36
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> America invades Iraq, slaughters a million people No they didn't. They were incredibly naive and thought that the Iraqis would jump for joy and become just like America when Saddam was taken out. Instead they decided to kill each other. > In the author's mind all of the fundamental, "Orthodox" institutions are controlled by liberals who control the "airwaves and pulpits and universities." Are you suggesting the med…

> No they didn't. Yes, it's all the Iraqis fault. And I'm sure you sincerely believe that despite it being utterly insane. > Are you suggesting the media, hollywood, and universities aren't left-leaning? Ironically, you've aptly demonstrated the entire point. If you asked this question to most people outside of America (you know, the other 7.3 billion people on the planet) I think many would probably agree that no, A…

> despite it being utterly insane.

Why is it insane?

> If you asked this question to most people outside of America

If you asked them if American media, Hollywood and universities were American-left then I think the vast majority would agree.

And that's what actually matters. Not what they consider to be left-wing by their own cultural standards.

Re: Can Things Be Both Popular and Silenced?

#37

As someone who reads and listen these people who are called "the intellectual dark web" I would not call them a group of intellectuals. Haidt and Pinker being exceptions. I like to listen Sam Harris and have read a little Mr. Peterson and even listen Joe Rogan who gets into the list somehow. If I criticize these guys it does not mean that I think their net contribution is net negative. Sam Harris is smart and nice to…

If they discuss ideas, they are intellectuals. A group, if there's a common idea that unites them, at least for now.

I think it's telling the fact that atheists and religious intellectuals are coming together for something.

Re: Can Things Be Both Popular and Silenced?

#38
post #14
post #4

[flagged]

I mean, I do feel like my ideas/community are the underdog and I'm not even all that rightwing (I'm pro stuff like basic income, but also against minimum wage). The thing about underdog is this. Our culture as produced in books/film/tv/music is dominated by left leaning beliefs. If your conservate the media that naturally surrounds you does not reflect or celebrate your values. Though I'm not saying they don't exist.…

I wouldn't really consider HN particularly left wing. It's fully capitalist and any thread that discusses social issues is full of libertarians. Anything that has a faint whiff of anti-capitalism is promptly removed from the front page.

Sure there are _some_ wide-spread beliefs here that happen to align with the left, but I would suggest that HN is far more libertarian than it is left-wing.

Re: Can Things Be Both Popular and Silenced?

#39

As someone who reads and listen these people who are called "the intellectual dark web" I would not call them a group of intellectuals. Haidt and Pinker being exceptions. I like to listen Sam Harris and have read a little Mr. Peterson and even listen Joe Rogan who gets into the list somehow. If I criticize these guys it does not mean that I think their net contribution is net negative. Sam Harris is smart and nice to…

I'm struggling to think of a definition of "intellectualism" that would exclude Jordan Peterson without also excluding, say, Germaine Greer?

Re: Can Things Be Both Popular and Silenced?

#40

As someone who reads and listen these people who are called "the intellectual dark web" I would not call them a group of intellectuals. Haidt and Pinker being exceptions. I like to listen Sam Harris and have read a little Mr. Peterson and even listen Joe Rogan who gets into the list somehow. If I criticize these guys it does not mean that I think their net contribution is net negative. Sam Harris is smart and nice to…

If they discuss ideas, they are intellectuals. A group, if there's a common idea that unites them, at least for now. I think it's telling the fact that atheists and religious intellectuals are coming together for something.

You are correct. I made an error for implying that they are not intellectuals.

They are lightweight intellectuals. Ideologues and pundits mostly.

Post reply on HN