Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe they should have just let people upload audio files with a title card, rather than fragment the service into another app. Would have fixed the bandwidth/battery problem and kept the interface, network, etc.
Lots of music just have a static image anyway, I wonder if YouTube couldn't figure something out to automatically re-encode such videos into audio-only streams, making them less bandwidth intensive. I'm no coder but that doesn't sound like something impossible to do.
YouTube Music, a new music streaming service, is coming soon
281–290 of 332 posts
Re: YouTube Music, a new music streaming service, is coming soon
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
I disagree. My YouTube experience greatly improved with red. No more ads. Ability to download videos for a long commute / plane ride.
You can do all of that easily without paying though, and without having the two screens issue.
Re: YouTube Music, a new music streaming service, is coming soon
#283> In a briefing this week, the company promised it will be closing gaps between the two services over the next month, so Google Play Music members don't lose the features they've grown accustomed to, including a cloud-based MP3 storage locker.
* Anyone paying today will be grandfathered in at their current price into Youtube Premium. If you aren't paying, Music will cost $10, Premium will be $12 for new subscribers.
[0] https://www.recode.net/2018/5/16/17363334/youtube-music-laun...
[1] https://www.cnet.com/news/youtube-music-is-googles-latest-st...
Re: YouTube Music, a new music streaming service, is coming soon
#284All I need is the ability to listen to the audio of YT videos with my phone screen off.
NewPipe has a "background mode". There's a short hiccup when you switch to "background mode" but you can still control it from there so it's not so bad. I find it shocking that Google is permitted to charge money for a feature like that, when as far as I can tell most of the music on Youtube was uploaded without permission of the copyright owner.
It says something in there along the lines of video and audio may not be separated. On the basis of which, they ran a witch hunt on all 3rd party YouTube apps on the Play Store, which had a background playback feature.
This in itself makes no sense, as separating video and audio during playback had always been possible on the desktop by simply switching to a different tab in your browser or minimizing the window.
But obviously, this wasn't about showing integrity. They published YouTube Red with its background playback feature just a few months after this witchhunt.
And since the Play Store is their property, they didn't even need a legitimate basis for throwing these apps out. They own the market, so they were able to just shut out the competition.
Don't build your life on Google property...
Re: YouTube Music, a new music streaming service, is coming soon
#285Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google Reader, Google Wave, any of whatever chat/video/voice offerings they're planning on killing off in the next year or so. I don't even remember what they're called.
Which of those products were paid products and killed off?
Re: YouTube Music, a new music streaming service, is coming soon
#286The way Google brands products reminds me of Microsoft when they tried to attach an unrelated product to a moderately popular consumer brand (Looking at you Groove Music, I mean Xbox Music, I mean Zune Music) There is nothing wrong with Google Play Music apart from the 'Play' misnomer. Google Music should be a standalone product that competes with Spotify. It's a well defined and well understood category. YouTube is…
Re: YouTube Music, a new music streaming service, is coming soon
#287Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well we're at 4 or 4.5 now. 1. YouTube 1.5 YT Music (basically a music-oriented front-end to YouTube) 2. Google Play Music All-Access 3. YouTube Music Premium (from the article) 4. (or 3.5) VEVO I particularly enjoyed this quote: > The days of jumping back and forth between multiple music apps and YouTube are over. As the above list shows, this is demonstrably false. Given that YouTube Red (or YouTube Premium as they…
It's comical. Google needs some PMs/POs/management who can reign in all the obvious internal politics. Google could own the streaming market if they could just build a coherent product, instead we get what you listed out.
All these different music apps and messaging apps... What's going on at Google?
What a mess.
Re: YouTube Music, a new music streaming service, is coming soon
#288Re: YouTube Music, a new music streaming service, is coming soon
#289Earlier quoted context omitted.
Chiming in real quick. Why the downvote HN? Let a guy have his preferences (:
I don't know for sure why the downvote, but maybe because Thailand is a place where you can be imprisoned or exiled for criticizing the (late) king. It's not hard to imagine somebody on HN might not be cool with somebody supporting that sort of enforced devotion.
Re: YouTube Music, a new music streaming service, is coming soon
#290The way Google brands products reminds me of Microsoft when they tried to attach an unrelated product to a moderately popular consumer brand (Looking at you Groove Music, I mean Xbox Music, I mean Zune Music) There is nothing wrong with Google Play Music apart from the 'Play' misnomer. Google Music should be a standalone product that competes with Spotify. It's a well defined and well understood category. YouTube is…