> But I believe that most men who have been to war would have to admit, if they are honest, that somewhere inside themselves they loved it too, loved it as much as anything that has happened to them before or since. This sounds conspicuously like the conservative version of the people who say "All men secretly desire to rape women."
I think this was written back before "people" became standard, in the 1980s I think "men" was still in vogue. It says men every few words, but that probably meant less than it does now. Aside, I think it's insane to argue that men "love war" while at the same time admitting knowledge of Vietnam. Weak men like to feel tough by pretending to like war, as if a politician would exert themselves more or less by calling in…
Why Men Love War (1984)
21–30 of 188 posts
Re: Why Men Love War (1984)
#22Edit: there appears also in the text, frequently, the world "tile" as an adjective. "tile night" "tile blackness" "tile war". Methinks someone needs a better find + replace regex.
Re: Why Men Love War (1984)
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think this was written back before "people" became standard, in the 1980s I think "men" was still in vogue. It says men every few words, but that probably meant less than it does now. Aside, I think it's insane to argue that men "love war" while at the same time admitting knowledge of Vietnam. Weak men like to feel tough by pretending to like war, as if a politician would exert themselves more or less by calling in…
War is a call to power and a purpose. It's also disgusting, but a man can get used to anything.
The only people who love war are corrupted individuals. They have no morals.
Re: Why Men Love War (1984)
#24Not that this isn't an interesting read (albeit mostly a lengthy rationalization of shared trauma) but they really need some better editors over at Esquire — spelling, spacing and grammatical errors everywhere. Edit: there appears also in the text, frequently, the world "tile" as an adjective. "tile night" "tile blackness" "tile war". Methinks someone needs a better find + replace regex.
Re: Why Men Love War (1984)
#25Re: Why Men Love War (1984)
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
War is a call to power and a purpose. It's also disgusting, but a man can get used to anything.
Since this was written in the 80s and it’s Esquire, it’s highly possible that the author is a military-industrial complex shill. Or an apologist at best. The only people who love war are corrupted individuals. They have no morals.
Not everyone thinks or feels like you. That doesn't necessarily make them morally corrupt individuals.
Re: Why Men Love War (1984)
#27> But I believe that most men who have been to war would have to admit, if they are honest, that somewhere inside themselves they loved it too, loved it as much as anything that has happened to them before or since. This sounds conspicuously like the conservative version of the people who say "All men secretly desire to rape women."
Or less controversially: "Everybody pees in the shower". No, sorry. I know you want to feel justified for doing so. But no.
Re: Why Men Love War (1984)
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or less controversially: "Everybody pees in the shower". No, sorry. I know you want to feel justified for doing so. But no.
Well, shit. I started doing that ‘cause I heard everyone else was, too...
I also regularly clean the shower.
Re: Why Men Love War (1984)
#29Not that this isn't an interesting read (albeit mostly a lengthy rationalization of shared trauma) but they really need some better editors over at Esquire — spelling, spacing and grammatical errors everywhere. Edit: there appears also in the text, frequently, the world "tile" as an adjective. "tile night" "tile blackness" "tile war". Methinks someone needs a better find + replace regex.
A bit necrophilic if you ask me. Author would probably be a lot less romantic were he to come back with life and not limb.
Re: Why Men Love War (1984)
#30— Robert E. Lee