Live data from Hacker News

Why Men Love War (1984)

esquire.com

21–30 of 188 posts

Re: Why Men Love War (1984)

#21

> But I believe that most men who have been to war would have to admit, if they are honest, that somewhere inside themselves they loved it too, loved it as much as anything that has happened to them before or since. This sounds conspicuously like the conservative version of the people who say "All men secretly desire to rape women."

I think this was written back before "people" became standard, in the 1980s I think "men" was still in vogue. It says men every few words, but that probably meant less than it does now. Aside, I think it's insane to argue that men "love war" while at the same time admitting knowledge of Vietnam. Weak men like to feel tough by pretending to like war, as if a politician would exert themselves more or less by calling in…

War is a call to power and a purpose. It's also disgusting, but a man can get used to anything.

Re: Why Men Love War (1984)

#22
Not that this isn't an interesting read (albeit mostly a lengthy rationalization of shared trauma) but they really need some better editors over at Esquire — spelling, spacing and grammatical errors everywhere.

Edit: there appears also in the text, frequently, the world "tile" as an adjective. "tile night" "tile blackness" "tile war". Methinks someone needs a better find + replace regex.

Re: Why Men Love War (1984)

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this was written back before "people" became standard, in the 1980s I think "men" was still in vogue. It says men every few words, but that probably meant less than it does now. Aside, I think it's insane to argue that men "love war" while at the same time admitting knowledge of Vietnam. Weak men like to feel tough by pretending to like war, as if a politician would exert themselves more or less by calling in…

War is a call to power and a purpose. It's also disgusting, but a man can get used to anything.

Since this was written in the 80s and it’s Esquire, it’s highly possible that the author is a military-industrial complex shill. Or an apologist at best.

The only people who love war are corrupted individuals. They have no morals.

Re: Why Men Love War (1984)

#24

Not that this isn't an interesting read (albeit mostly a lengthy rationalization of shared trauma) but they really need some better editors over at Esquire — spelling, spacing and grammatical errors everywhere. Edit: there appears also in the text, frequently, the world "tile" as an adjective. "tile night" "tile blackness" "tile war". Methinks someone needs a better find + replace regex.

Loos like a poor OCR of a previous text. All they really needed was a proofreader. Why they didn't even bother is the real question.

Re: Why Men Love War (1984)

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

War is a call to power and a purpose. It's also disgusting, but a man can get used to anything.

Since this was written in the 80s and it’s Esquire, it’s highly possible that the author is a military-industrial complex shill. Or an apologist at best. The only people who love war are corrupted individuals. They have no morals.

When I was a young man, the military appealed to me. I liked its presentation of power. Its structure, order, and clear roles seemed to provide a sense of purpose. Maybe war itself would be bad, but the structures and forces that war brings seem like they wouldn't necessarily be bad for everyone.

Not everyone thinks or feels like you. That doesn't necessarily make them morally corrupt individuals.

Re: Why Men Love War (1984)

#27

> But I believe that most men who have been to war would have to admit, if they are honest, that somewhere inside themselves they loved it too, loved it as much as anything that has happened to them before or since. This sounds conspicuously like the conservative version of the people who say "All men secretly desire to rape women."

Or less controversially: "Everybody pees in the shower". No, sorry. I know you want to feel justified for doing so. But no.

As long as you’re alone in the shower I think it’s ok.

Re: Why Men Love War (1984)

#28
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or less controversially: "Everybody pees in the shower". No, sorry. I know you want to feel justified for doing so. But no.

Well, shit. I started doing that ‘cause I heard everyone else was, too...

I started because it saves time, urine is sterile when expelled and I am using soap to wash the rest of me which should clean everything after up. Makes sense to do it then, rather than use an extra couple gallons to flush 500ml of liquid to what is ultimately the same place.

I also regularly clean the shower.

Re: Why Men Love War (1984)

#29

Not that this isn't an interesting read (albeit mostly a lengthy rationalization of shared trauma) but they really need some better editors over at Esquire — spelling, spacing and grammatical errors everywhere. Edit: there appears also in the text, frequently, the world "tile" as an adjective. "tile night" "tile blackness" "tile war". Methinks someone needs a better find + replace regex.

Nevermind, I just finished the second half.

A bit necrophilic if you ask me. Author would probably be a lot less romantic were he to come back with life and not limb.

Post reply on HN