Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Software sucks

shitpost.plover.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

81–90 of 93 posts

Re: Software sucks

#81

Post by coldtea »

pdonis wrote: post #53
vortico wrote: post #43

The reason for pretty much any bug found in software driven by a huge company is that there is a large disconnect between fixing bugs and profit. Fixing a bug almost never excites users, and even if it did in this case, they won't see a measurable increase of users of their software, so you can't prove a profit increase. Even if a bug is fixed, the effort might be wasted when a large overhaul of the system happens be…

> The reason for pretty much any bug found in software driven by a huge company is that there is a large disconnect between fixing bugs and profit. Exactly. The answer to any complaint like the one described in this article (and I have similar ones about my phone all the time) is "how much would you be willing to pay to fix this?" Of course, it doesn't help that, even if I were willing to pay to fix this, I have no w…

>Of course, it doesn't help that, even if I were willing to pay to fix this, I have no way of doing so; even if, say, 100,000 or 100 million users would all be willing to pay to fix it, so that the amount in play might actually be enough to compensate a developer to do the work, we have no way of coordinating such a payment.

No, but we can always go and use another app that doesn't have as many problems.

Re: Software sucks

#82

Post by coldtea »

mattmanser wrote: post #63
vortico wrote: post #43

The reason for pretty much any bug found in software driven by a huge company is that there is a large disconnect between fixing bugs and profit. Fixing a bug almost never excites users, and even if it did in this case, they won't see a measurable increase of users of their software, so you can't prove a profit increase. Even if a bug is fixed, the effort might be wasted when a large overhaul of the system happens be…

This isn't a bug. Recommendations are just hard. He's trivializing it, but specifically mentions that including one 5.7 miles away would be fine. And then promptly says because he visited it before. That's some complicated intelligence and pattern matching that he's asking for. What exactly should it be ranking by? Proximity and popularity and traffic density and Google rating and awhole load of other things. The rul…

>This isn't a bug. Recommendations are just hard.

What is hard about ordering a bloody list of places by distance?

>He's trivializing it, but specifically mentions that including one 5.7 miles away would be fine. And then promptly says because he visited it before.

Well, they could first add the bloody sorting, then we can think about whether they should mark or prioritize previously visited places (which itself does not take any "complicated intelligence and pattern matching" -- it's just persisting visited places and consulting their list).

Re: Software sucks

#83

Post by coldtea »

mattmanser wrote: post #72
SmellyGeekBoy wrote: post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seems like a case of adding "ORDER BY number_of_previous_visits, distance" to a SQL query...

Having actually programmed search functionality like this I can assure you, it's really not. That's what you start with. Even if you put aside that distance is something that has to be calculated through triangulation as many systems now include that. Especially when you add in rankings, you start having to think about sorting by multiple layers, circles of distance with ranking sorted by that. So the really good mat…

>Having actually programmed search functionality like this I can assure you, it's really not. That's what you start with. Even if you put aside that distance is something that has to be calculated through triangulation as many systems now include that.

It already prints a distance.

It could use that. Or, if it is some kind of point to point distance, it could calculate a driving distance and use that if it wanted to be extra smart.

Add the type of place it shows, and be done with it.

>Especially when you add in rankings, you start having to think about sorting by multiple layers, circles of distance with ranking sorted by that.

We've been doing multiple criteria sorting for millennia. It's not rocket science either.

>So the really good match 20 miles away is shown lower than the pretty good match 5 miles away, but they're both shown above the bad match 7 miles away.

Why is one "really good" and the other's (that are also of the same store) not? They are bloody stores of a franchize.

Don't try to be clever and define what's "good" and just show them to me sorted by distance AND type (in case there's a city called that too or something). End of story.

>And you can bet people will still find scenarios where they'll say "why's it doing this? I'd expect the order to be different".

People might or might not say anything. But way fewer will be confused by a distance sorted list + an indication of what the item they saw is (store, city, village etc), than with this clusterfuck of a result.

Re: Software sucks

#84

Post by mattmanser »

coldtea wrote: post #83
mattmanser wrote: post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Having actually programmed search functionality like this I can assure you, it's really not. That's what you start with. Even if you put aside that distance is something that has to be calculated through triangulation as many systems now include that. Especially when you add in rankings, you start having to think about sorting by multiple layers, circles of distance with ranking sorted by that. So the really good mat…

> Having actually programmed search functionality like this I can assure you, it's really not. That's what you start with. Even if you put aside that distance is something that has to be calculated through triangulation as many systems now include that. It already prints a distance. It could use that. Or, if it is some kind of point to point distance, it could calculate a driving distance and use that if it wanted to…

There's a massive difference to printing 10 distances from your result set, and calculating 10 million. I'm not sure why you had to exaggerate "millennia".

How does a computer know that searching "Wawa" means you want the store and not the town? You haven't even considered that. It's a search term.

And a really good system would clearly takes a load of things you're not considering into account, relevance, rank, personal relevance, historical relevance age, etc. A really good system might even helpfully try to include traffic density, how busy a store was, etc. What if all the stores near him have 1 star google reviews? What if some of those Wawas are paying for adverts and some aren't? What if some of them have opening times set up, and some don't?

As I say, their ranking system might be working great for other things, but something like this it spits out crap.

Re: Software sucks

#85

Post by wintorez »

wintorez wrote: post #16

Software does not suck; requirements, especially from non-technical stake-holders suck. Every single piece of software starts with a single and easy to understand idea, then different stakeholders arrive and start adding inputs and often conflicting requirements, and then software starts to suck. None of these would have happened if we knew how to say "No". :(

This was intended to be a rant on complexity, but I just got carried away. Important lesson on not letting emotions getting the best of me.

Re: Software sucks

#86

Post by coldtea »

mattmanser wrote: post #84
coldtea wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Having actually programmed search functionality like this I can assure you, it's really not. That's what you start with. Even if you put aside that distance is something that has to be calculated through triangulation as many systems now include that. It already prints a distance. It could use that. Or, if it is some kind of point to point distance, it could calculate a driving distance and use that if it wanted to…

There's a massive difference to printing 10 distances from your result set, and calculating 10 million. I'm not sure why you had to exaggerate "millennia". How does a computer know that searching "Wawa" means you want the store and not the town? You haven't even considered that. It's a search term. And a really good system would clearly takes a load of things you're not considering into account, relevance, rank, pers…

>There's a massive difference to printing 10 distances from your result set, and calculating 10 million.

Well, no reason to calculate 10 million. If another way to select a list of top suggestions to show is less costly, you can just calculate the distance for the existing suggestions they're already about to show - and then show them sorted by the distance).

Having the unknown criteria they used to pick the suggestions reflected in the order they show them is not useful to anyone though.

>I'm not sure why you had to exaggerate "millennia".

Not exaggerating -- pointing to the fact that we know techniques to do it, and we have been doing it (obviously manually before computers) for millennia.

>How does a computer know that searching "Wawa" means you want the store and not the town? You haven't even considered that.

I did, and I mention it in 2 places in my response above: they could either sort all by distance and display what each entry is next to it (e.g. town, store, etc), or give sorted lists for different types of results (e.g. locations vs businesses).

>And a really good system would clearly takes a load of things you're not considering into account, relevance, rank, personal relevance, historical relevance age, etc.

Whatever the above system "took into account" it failed. And it's a case that's common to 99% of the population (search for a business). Searching for a location is another 99% common case.

Historical relevance and age? Who cares besides tourists (and even them, when they're not searching for a location or a business but for sightseeing)? A system should have sane defaults and hide those other things under user enabled search/sort criteria.

Re: Software sucks

#87

Post by fjsolwmv »

coldtea wrote: post #82
mattmanser wrote: post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This isn't a bug. Recommendations are just hard. He's trivializing it, but specifically mentions that including one 5.7 miles away would be fine. And then promptly says because he visited it before. That's some complicated intelligence and pattern matching that he's asking for. What exactly should it be ranking by? Proximity and popularity and traffic density and Google rating and awhole load of other things. The rul…

> This isn't a bug. Recommendations are just hard. What is hard about ordering a bloody list of places by distance? > He's trivializing it, but specifically mentions that including one 5.7 miles away would be fine. And then promptly says because he visited it before. Well, they could first add the bloody sorting, then we can think about whether they should mark or prioritize previously visited places (which itself do…

I like you feigned exasperation at the simplicity of it all and then immediately noticed one of many many complicating factors.

Re: Software sucks

#88

Post by fjsolwmv »

bitwize wrote: post #45

Google Maps apparently thinks I'm Prompto from Final Fantasy XV, and will send me alerts of points of interest (usually restaurants) suggesting I take pictures of them. Uh, no. If I want to go somewhere, I'll ask you, Google Maps. It's shit like this that makes me glad I switched to OsmAnd (despite the latter lacking in features, such as finding an optimal foot/bus/train route).

You can turn off those adnotifications. They are kind of annoying, but one popup plus a button to block future popups is a small price for a powerful app.

Re: Software sucks

#89

Post by coldtea »

fjsolwmv wrote: post #87
coldtea wrote: post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This isn't a bug. Recommendations are just hard. What is hard about ordering a bloody list of places by distance? > He's trivializing it, but specifically mentions that including one 5.7 miles away would be fine. And then promptly says because he visited it before. Well, they could first add the bloody sorting, then we can think about whether they should mark or prioritize previously visited places (which itself do…

I like you feigned exasperation at the simplicity of it all and then immediately noticed one of many many complicating factors.

My point is that all the "complicating factors" are still trivial -- each alone, or put together.

My second point is also that even if they weren't (for some exotic cases) , the most common cases and sane defaults, remain trivial -- and anything else could be relegated to settings and the like.

My third point is also that no matter how easy or hard the complicating factors, a screen like the one shown by the poster, is an utter failure.

To continue on this 2nd and 3rd point, it's like people are trying to defend Clippy, the office assistant, by saying that "AI is hard".

It might be, but getting Clippy out of my bloody monitor and not having it disturb me when I try to compose a Word document, is very easy. MS could always do that (and that's what they ended up doing).

Re: Software sucks

#90

Post by pdonis »

coldtea wrote: post #81
pdonis wrote: post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The reason for pretty much any bug found in software driven by a huge company is that there is a large disconnect between fixing bugs and profit. Exactly. The answer to any complaint like the one described in this article (and I have similar ones about my phone all the time) is "how much would you be willing to pay to fix this?" Of course, it doesn't help that, even if I were willing to pay to fix this, I have no w…

> Of course, it doesn't help that, even if I were willing to pay to fix this, I have no way of doing so; even if, say, 100,000 or 100 million users would all be willing to pay to fix it, so that the amount in play might actually be enough to compensate a developer to do the work, we have no way of coordinating such a payment. No, but we can always go and use another app that doesn't have as many problems.

> we can always go and use another app that doesn't have as many problems

What other app? What apps don't have random bugs or obviously insane behavior popping up when you least expect it?

Post reply on HN