We're going from cold war to all-in. Not just a privacy question. Reddit nags me every time I hit the front page, even returning from a story, asking me to log in. For most sites I need to create ublock filters to prevent pop-ups with useless "we use cookies", subscription requests, ads or social media bars that fills half the screen, etc. etc. etc. Every newspaper I read has decided that autostarting video and strea…
You do know that this is not a "web problem". Just spend 10 minutes with your average 13yr old and see how many times they get bombed in the face with one of those interstitial ads. Also it is easier to root your phone with a malicious app than with a web page. Heck, if you are an app developer why even bother to root phones when you can just do whatever you want, after all if the user does not give you all-in permis…
Facebook Container for Firefox
261–270 of 406 posts
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#262Third party cookies, and any way to fingerprint a specific user starting from high entropy user agents to screen resolution, font fingerprinting or canvas data, should be considered a breach of the browser security model. All sites should run in containers and no advertiser should be able to track you across sessions. When I want 3rd party interaction, I should need to opt in and connect the current site with Faceboo…
Ever encountered Google ReCaptcha when you've turned off third party cookies or while in incognito/private mode? It's a nightmare, even if you're logged into a Google account. You can be shown upto 7-8 challenges, painfully slow loading images and Google's insistence that they encountered malicious traffic from your IP when attempting to use the audio version. What's even worse is they track your mouse movements and…
The pessimist in me thinks that if a browser were to disallow third party cookies, users might simply switch to a different browser that does allow them.
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#263Earlier quoted context omitted.
The security model of the internet is whack. Javascript should be opt-in, especially from 3rd party sources. "This website wants/requires javascript for an enhanced viewing experience [allow/deny]". Instead not only will any stock browser gladly run anything thrown at it, it will also accept any cookies and now run WebGL code, trigger DRM engines and various other things. All that because the engineers who wrote the…
Spot on. And most of website should not even need javascript but some simple extension to xhtml to allow interactive websites in a declarative fashion rather than having a Turing-complete language.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2300836 (2011) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10734966 (2015)
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#264I have a similar need for Google. I have two gmail accounts. One is to preserve my privacy. But I can only open one at the time. That's acceptable since I forward mails. But then, everything I do at Google is tracked and associated with this opened gmail account. Once we are connected to Google, we are kind of logged in Google. They can track everything we do, even searches. The problem I'm facing is that I can't kee…
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
Spot on. And most of website should not even need javascript but some simple extension to xhtml to allow interactive websites in a declarative fashion rather than having a Turing-complete language.
CSS is Turing-complete. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2300836 (2011) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10734966 (2015)
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#266If you use Firefox Containers, including the Facebook Container, please also use Cookie AutoDelete [1] to get rid of cookies from closed tabs across containers. Otherwise, in my observation, sites will still be able to track you if you reuse a container (even after closing all tabs of that container) for a specific site. [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/cookie-autode...
But doesn't that mean you need to login again each time you go to a website? Sure, by saving passwords in Firefox it isn't a huge hassle, but a cookie is still more practical...
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#267If it only was that easy!
The real problem is not cookies.
I can already delete those.
The real problem is fingerprinting.
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#268We're going from cold war to all-in. Not just a privacy question. Reddit nags me every time I hit the front page, even returning from a story, asking me to log in. For most sites I need to create ublock filters to prevent pop-ups with useless "we use cookies", subscription requests, ads or social media bars that fills half the screen, etc. etc. etc. Every newspaper I read has decided that autostarting video and strea…
> autostarting video and streaming Super annoying. In Firefox in about:config, you can set: media.autoplay.enabled to false. That works well for me.
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#269Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hmm. I'm not sure I can follow. The browser not being able to distinguish between essential and non-essential cookies does not change the fact that cookies are and were entirely voluntary.
Right, but there's no reason to think the legislators didn't know that, because their goal was not to prevent the use of all cookies.
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#270Third party cookies, and any way to fingerprint a specific user starting from high entropy user agents to screen resolution, font fingerprinting or canvas data, should be considered a breach of the browser security model. All sites should run in containers and no advertiser should be able to track you across sessions. When I want 3rd party interaction, I should need to opt in and connect the current site with Faceboo…
Indeed. Safari blocks 3rd party cookies by default, I see no reason why Firefox can't do the same. The fact that they don't is a direct contradiction to their claims that they care about user privacy. The only explanation I have is that they do not want to anger their long-time money sources Google and other advertisers.