Live data from Hacker News

YouTube and Facebook Are Losing Creators to Blockchain-Powered Rivals

bloomberg.com

11–20 of 295 posts

Re: YouTube and Facebook Are Losing Creators to Blockchain-Powered Rivals

#12

Hahahaha, no they are not.

How do you know that ? Are you familiar with Dtube or steemit ?

As a Dtube user, It's true that there are more and more content creators everyday on the platform.

The amount of content is still veeeeery far away for Youtube's, I'm pretty sure Youtube/Medium/Twitter don't really care about their blockchain-based counterparts right now, because of how small and hard to scale they are

Re: YouTube and Facebook Are Losing Creators to Blockchain-Powered Rivals

#13
post #10

I'm not sure I understand. Are these sites paying with cryptocurrencies or is the content delivery based on blockchains? The article is a bit vague about this.

The article is shit, that's for sure.

Only the payment is via cryptocurrency. The content delivery is as centralized as ever, so this does not change anything wrt to "privacy concerns, censorship".

Re: YouTube and Facebook Are Losing Creators to Blockchain-Powered Rivals

#14
post #10

I'm not sure I understand. Are these sites paying with cryptocurrencies or is the content delivery based on blockchains? The article is a bit vague about this.

> paying with cryptocurrencies or is the content delivery based on blockchains

Both

"Because of the decentralized nature of IPFS and the STEEM blockchain, D.Tube is not able to censor videos, nor enforce guidelines. Only the users can censor it, through the power of their upvotes and downvotes."

Re: YouTube and Facebook Are Losing Creators to Blockchain-Powered Rivals

#15
You know what's interesting? A Decentralised media platform used to be huge and actually is still huge: Torrents.

There's a huge community that consumes media that's not hosted anywhere particular and there are apps like Popcorn Time that offer viewing experience almost as good as Netflix.

The problem, of course, is that up until now there was no way to reward the creators and almost all the media consumed on Torrents is illicit copies of copyrighted material that don't bring direct benefits to its creators.

It is a huge topic in the blockchain community to find a way to reward content creators and we see early attempts that may or may not succeed at this.

Another issue is the "Averagisation" of the content. The moment that you make a content that advertisers might find controversial you risk losing your reward for that content so advertising financed media fails to capture anything beyond the mainstream entertainment. This has another unfortunate outcome, which is that people who don't want to get a direct reward for their content but hoping to be rewarded with political influence can afford to continue producing content that tends to be extremist(veganism, left and right politics, racism, conspiracy theories - you name it). So we end up with extremely light content that's something between product unboxing and funny videos not touching any sensitive topic and extremely edgy content that depicts the world as black and white and if you are not one of us you are one of them. Your average monetised content on Youtube is extremely light and your average popular non-monetised conted is extremeley heavy.

At this time you'll find that these new decentralised platforms are full of the extremist's stuff, as it is just another platform to spread their influence but in the long run, I believe that they will be diluted and will offer a platform where non-extremist but alternative cultures can flourish.

Re: YouTube and Facebook Are Losing Creators to Blockchain-Powered Rivals

#18

I see a lot of articles talking about ad revenue. For most YouTubers ad revenue is minuscule compared to what they make on product placements. Someone in the lifestyle/beauty segment with say 300k subs on YT (and similiar IG following) might make 500$ in ads a month on YouTube but 8k to 10k per product placement. This doesn't include multi-post deals (usually YT and IG combined) that will yield (from what I have seen…

Well, product placements are still advertisement. It simply means that these ads are not managed by Google but other agencies that match Youtubers with advertisers. I wonder if Google is happy with that?

Re: YouTube and Facebook Are Losing Creators to Blockchain-Powered Rivals

#20
post #10

I'm not sure I understand. Are these sites paying with cryptocurrencies or is the content delivery based on blockchains? The article is a bit vague about this.

> paying with cryptocurrencies or is the content delivery based on blockchains Both "Because of the decentralized nature of IPFS and the STEEM blockchain, D.Tube is not able to censor videos, nor enforce guidelines. Only the users can censor it, through the power of their upvotes and downvotes."

Videos are distributed by http://d.tube, and hosted on http://ipfs.io, so obviously that's a lie.
Post reply on HN