Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
201–210 of 477 posts
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#202The only thing genuinely useful on the touchbar is the fingerprint reader, after you enable the PAM module. Well technically the reader isn't part of the touchbar, so I guess that doesn't count now that I think about it.
I dislike the fingerprint reader and don't use it on my tbMBP. Someone could physically force me to use the fingerprint reader, or might just cut off my finger to use it, which is even worse. I wish macOS had a built in TOTP system.
Not that I'm worried about someone pulling this spy operation on me but if my laptop is lost or stolen, I won't have the peace of mind.
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't forget the huge price hike "because of the touchbar" that included the non-touchbar model.
That's their "because we know you'll buy it anyway" factor.
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#204Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can pry my model m from my cold dead fingers. Haptics is no substitute for actual physical feedback.
Have you tried pressing the home button on iPhone 7 or 8, or clicking a trackpad on a recent MacBook Pro?
The home button on the new iphones feels _weird_, almost as if there's this strange, unnatural delay to the click actually occurring. For something that purports to be "just like real life" it does a poor job.
The click on the mbp trackpads is not too bad though.
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#206I am really "worried" about two features coming out of Apple the past few years: The touch bar mentioned here and the "3D touch" feature of the iPhone 7+. These are "obviously" bad interaction designs yet they come out of a company having almost infinite resources when it comes to design. What is going on here? Is it the marketing department taking over? Is it "we have created this chip and now we have to use it some…
The touch bar I agree is major marketing hype.
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#207I was upset about the touch bar because of the esc key since I am a heavy vim user. Then someone recommended I switch my esc and caps lock keys, now it doesn't bug me anymore. The caps lock key is in a much more convenient position for the esc function anyways.
What annoys me is that this esc capslock swapping option only shows up on macs with touch bar. If I should get used to it I need it on all of my machines.
Source: I also made the switch to capslock-as-esc when I got the TB MBP and it made me decide to switch the keyboard on my other two macs as well.
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#208> I decided to steal this feature and make the "coffee break" button. It locks the laptop and switches the screen off. Ctrl+cmd+q = lock screen. Display will dim/sleep shortly after that. (Found this out myself not too long ago, I think because of HN). Incidentally, I just switched the touch bar to the standard function key display with fn switching to the buttons just like the keyboards of old. I found I almost neve…
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
True, but its 13" non-touchbar max specs are same as touchbar 13". So the comparison isn't really fair.
The touch bar 13" has 4 Thunderbolt ports and Intel Iris 650 graphics, compared to the non-touch bar with 2 ports and Intel Iris 640.