Earlier quoted context omitted.
A warrant is required only as long as "voice assistant" technology "is not in general public use"[1]. Kyllo v United States created a bright-line[3] test that removes the warrant requirement to see "details of a private home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion"[2] when use of the technology is normalized. Note that this removes the warrant requirement in general , even if you persona…
> The test is if the public expects audio in the home might be recorded and sent to a 3rd party. If the answer is "yes", then the police can use their own hardware to do the recording. Honest question, are you an attorney or can one comment? I am not, but I don't read this opinion the same way. The case referenced concerns using thermal imaging from outside a home to look inside it, which I guess makes sense then tha…
This isn't to say courts will rule one way to the other, or that the courts won't change their mind, but a well reasoned opinion form a different court is powerful.