11–20 of 364 posts
https://pulse.turbobytes.com/results/5ac1f967ecbe4078c200ee4... Cloudflare consistently times out from these networks. Netherlands - AS13127 Philippines - AS135132 Thailand - AS17552 (One of the largest consumer internet providers) US - AS7018 (AT&T)
https://pulse.turbobytes.com/results/5ac1f967ecbe4078c200ee4... Cloudflare consistently times out from these networks. Netherlands - AS13127 Philippines - AS135132 Thailand - AS17552 (One of the largest consumer internet providers) US - AS7018 (AT&T)
I wasn't aware of Quad9, it seems like a pretty great option for those that are easy targets of scams/phishing.
Quad9 is supported/funded by City Of London Police, the same police that cooperates with ad companies to track people online. https://www.theguardian.com/media-network/media-network-blog... Keep away from this.
The simple fact that it's supported by the CoLP doesn't seem sufficient to point out that Quad9 should be avoided since it will track people online.
It would be more interesting to see how are they doing for some websites in the long tail, try the 900th, 9000th, and 90000th most popular sites instead of the top. And try some locations which are not actual datacenters?
dig +noall +stats @1.0.0.1 news.ycombinator.com; dig +noall +stats @1.1.1.1 news.ycombinator.com; dig +noall +stats @208.67.220.220 news.ycombinator.com; dig +noall +stats @208.67.222.222 news.ycombinator.com; dig +noall +stats @8.8.4.4 news.ycombinator.com; dig +noall +stats @8.8.8.8 news.ycombinator.com Fixed? =P I removed some of the records form the article after reading some of the comments here. Cloudflare, Goo…
You should be doing `dig @1.1.1.1 news.ycombinator.com`
You're looking for "dig @1.1.1.1 news.ycombinator.com" which will resolve "news.ycombinator.com" using "1.1.1.1".
https://pulse.turbobytes.com/results/5ac1f967ecbe4078c200ee4... Cloudflare consistently times out from these networks. Netherlands - AS13127 Philippines - AS135132 Thailand - AS17552 (One of the largest consumer internet providers) US - AS7018 (AT&T)
I'm sure this is because 1.1.1.1 does not work everywhere well. Maybe with 1.0.0.1 it will work more reliable.
~# mtr --report --address 192.168.2.2 1.1.1.1
Start: Mon Apr 2 16:53:31 2018
HOST: apu Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 192.168.2.1 0.0% 10 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.2 0.0
2.|-- 10.137.128.1 0.0% 10 11.3 12.8 10.7 17.1 1.8
3.|-- 10.246.253.133 0.0% 10 7.7 8.2 7.5 9.1 0.0
4.|-- 10.185.94.203 0.0% 10 9.1 8.4 6.9 9.4 0.6
5.|-- 10.185.94.25 0.0% 10 9.5 8.7 7.7 10.0 0.5
6.|-- 61-91-220-101.static.asia 0.0% 10 11.7 11.7 8.6 25.7 5.2
7.|-- 58-97-82-116.static.asian 0.0% 10 10.7 10.2 8.6 15.4 1.9
8.|-- ppp-171-102-254-81.revip1 0.0% 10 9.2 9.2 7.1 10.8 0.9
9.|-- ppp-171-102-250-134.revip 0.0% 10 8.4 10.0 8.4 11.3 0.7
10.|-- ppp-171-102-250-149.revip 0.0% 10 9.0 9.7 9.0 10.9 0.3
11.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
~# mtr --report --address 192.168.2.2 1.0.0.1
Start: Mon Apr 2 16:54:05 2018
HOST: apu Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 192.168.2.1 0.0% 10 1.2 1.1 0.8 1.3 0.0
2.|-- 10.137.128.1 0.0% 10 12.1 12.8 9.2 18.2 2.4
3.|-- 10.246.253.133 0.0% 10 9.8 9.0 7.5 14.7 2.0
4.|-- 10.185.94.203 0.0% 10 4.4 7.9 4.4 8.8 1.2
5.|-- 10.185.94.17 0.0% 10 9.2 9.1 7.2 10.3 0.9
6.|-- 61-91-220-55.static.asian 0.0% 10 9.7 10.6 8.0 17.2 2.6
7.|-- 58-97-82-120.static.asian 0.0% 10 10.5 9.7 8.2 11.2 0.7
8.|-- ppp-171-102-254-65.revip1 0.0% 10 10.5 9.7 8.8 10.7 0.0
9.|-- ppp-171-102-254-227.revip 0.0% 10 8.9 13.1 8.8 44.0 10.8
10.|-- 61-91-213-130.static.asia 0.0% 10 10.9 9.8 8.3 10.9 0.6
11.|-- TIG-Net242-40.trueinterga 0.0% 10 15.0 14.1 10.9 16.1 1.8
12.|-- TIG-Net245-243.trueinterg 0.0% 10 38.1 38.0 36.4 40.6 0.9
13.|-- 13335.sgw.equinix.com 0.0% 10 37.4 38.6 36.4 48.5 3.5
14.|-- 1dot1dot1dot1.cloudflare- 0.0% 10 36.9 36.3 35.0 36.9 0.5
I wasn't aware of Quad9, it seems like a pretty great option for those that are easy targets of scams/phishing.
Quad9 is supported/funded by City Of London Police, the same police that cooperates with ad companies to track people online. https://www.theguardian.com/media-network/media-network-blog... Keep away from this.
(Actually, it's not really a difficult choice at all, is it?)
It would be more interesting to see how are they doing for some websites in the long tail, try the 900th, 9000th, and 90000th most popular sites instead of the top. And try some locations which are not actual datacenters?
And test consistency. Stddev, and get the worst results from 1000 runs.
dig +noall +stats @1.0.0.1 news.ycombinator.com; dig +noall +stats @1.1.1.1 news.ycombinator.com; dig +noall +stats @208.67.220.220 news.ycombinator.com; dig +noall +stats @208.67.222.222 news.ycombinator.com; dig +noall +stats @8.8.4.4 news.ycombinator.com; dig +noall +stats @8.8.8.8 news.ycombinator.com Fixed? =P I removed some of the records form the article after reading some of the comments here. Cloudflare, Goo…
You should be doing `dig @1.1.1.1 news.ycombinator.com`
EDIT: fixed, so I've undowned