Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I doubt that here, on HN, most of us would go so deep with conspiracy, but rational thinking did not lead me to the conclusion that Putin is responsible this time. Putin is given far too much credit. But the Russian wetworks division, under Putin's authority, has its fingerprints all over the Salisbury attack. > shouldn't people like Assange reveal it? Largely Assange has been an anti-liberal democracy apologist fo…
> But the Russian wetworks division, under Putin's authority, has its fingerprints all over the Salisbury attack. There is strong circumstantial evidence, but proof is a slightly different game. It would be nice, for example, to have a clear motive for why Russia might have poisoned the man. According to the wiki article the Russian justice system had sentenced him to 13 years in a penal colony in 2006, and then hand…
Ecuador cuts off Julian Assange's internet access at London embassy
61–70 of 162 posts
Re: Ecuador cuts off Julian Assange's internet access at London embassy
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
That would kinda seem to be the point of it.
From three seconds of googling. Wikileaks releases documents it claims detail Russia mass surveillance apparatus https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/19/wikileaks-releases-documen...
> It’s the _first_ time the organization has leaked (what it claims is) material directly pertaining to the Russian state.
So... first time for how many years? And as, article points out, the leak itself is rather minor.
Re: Ecuador cuts off Julian Assange's internet access at London embassy
#63How ... convenient all of Wikileaks were damaging to the government of the USA and somehow never to the government of Russia. And, of course, Mr Assange had his show on RT (Russia Today). No way he is a Russian agent. No way.
Re: Ecuador cuts off Julian Assange's internet access at London embassy
#64Here's the plan. We form a large enough mob of people who are dressed to look exactly like Assange (wigs and all), then he can just run into the mob and disperse, make contact with sympathizers, and flee to a less oppressive country.
Personally I think that by now he should get it over with and walk out, be arrested, do the time for skipping bail and then he can put his extradition theory to the test. The current political leadership in the USA is about as pro Assange as it is ever going to get.
Re: Ecuador cuts off Julian Assange's internet access at London embassy
#65The reason is that he was tweeting again in favour of Catalan Republicans, more precisely against the current wave of political prisoners that Spain is taking, including probably the last Catalan elected president, now under custody in Germany.
This is confirmed by Assange himself in his last tweet "I have no right to twit about political prisoners."
The guy is now a hero to many catalans. He will be an honorary citizen of the forthcoming Catalan Republic, and there are already talks of erecting a statue of him in the center of Barcelona!
Re: Ecuador cuts off Julian Assange's internet access at London embassy
#66How ... convenient all of Wikileaks were damaging to the government of the USA and somehow never to the government of Russia. And, of course, Mr Assange had his show on RT (Russia Today). No way he is a Russian agent. No way.
Assange basically did what he could to damage the interests of the USA, and probably succeeded wildly beyond his dreams. He's made a whole bunch of stupid calls and he's blown his own credibility and that of WikiLeaks by showing an overt agenda instead of just being a 'dumb pipe'.
Funny though, the one time that he did act as a dumb pipe everybody was screaming blue murder about how irresponsible that was.
Re: Ecuador cuts off Julian Assange's internet access at London embassy
#67Assange's communications have been cut down due to the overwhelming pressure of the Spanish government into Ecuador. This is clearly explained in the official communication of the Ecuador government : https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZY7pY1WkAALgkz.jpg (could not find a better link) The reason is that he was tweeting again in favour of Catalan Republicans, more precisely against the current wave of political prisoners th…
Even sadder is how the most accessible channnels of communication (tv, for instance) have become state and corporate mediums for propaganda.
Re: Ecuador cuts off Julian Assange's internet access at London embassy
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
No. Not nearly enough.
Yes I did get the memo. This is 2018, now Russia takes the place of "axis of evil" Iraq and Taleban. A greater axis of evil. Much feared bear.
So there is a huge amount of hypocrisy there. But that does not excuse Russia for meddling in the affairs of The USA or Europe either.
They're all guilty of this, some more than others.
Re: Ecuador cuts off Julian Assange's internet access at London embassy
#69Assange's communications have been cut down due to the overwhelming pressure of the Spanish government into Ecuador. This is clearly explained in the official communication of the Ecuador government : https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZY7pY1WkAALgkz.jpg (could not find a better link) The reason is that he was tweeting again in favour of Catalan Republicans, more precisely against the current wave of political prisoners th…
Re: Ecuador cuts off Julian Assange's internet access at London embassy
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
You fully support a propaganda agency?
Most of what comes out of US mainstream media is propaganda. I support alternate sources in conjunction with those. What I don't support is getting all your info from a single narrative. Edit: there are obviously a lot of brainwashed people or actual agents in this thread doing some unfair downvoting.
No, it isn't. There is a lot of pretty good journalism and then there is a bunch of trash. But the balance - for now - is still on the good side. If Rupert Murdoch kicked the bucket it might get a bit better still.
> I support alternate sources in conjunction with those.
Such as?
FOX vs Russia Today is not 'alternate' by any definition.
But if you want to compare the Washington Post with the BBC or Al Jazeera then you might find some balance between those.
> What I don't support is getting all your info from a single narrative.
Agreed, but which narratives you pick still makes a huge difference even when you are trying to discount for bias.
> Edit: there are obviously a lot of brainwashed people or actual agents in this thread doing some unfair downvoting.
Or maybe they just don't subscribe to your views and are letting you know their disagreement by downvoting you.
If you think HN is full of brainwashed people or actual agents because of a couple of downvotes I suspect the problem is on your end.