Live data from Hacker News

Analyst: Cambridge Analytica, Palantir and Quid Helped Trump Win Election (2017)

medium.com

1–10 of 28 posts

Re: Analyst: Cambridge Analytica, Palantir and Quid Helped Trump Win Election (2017)

#5
No, they didn’t. Trump won because people liked his message. Plain and simple. These companies existed long before 2016 and if they couldn’t help other legitimate candidates get elected, what could they have done so magical for Trump?

Is it really so hard to believe that people didn’t like Hillary and didn’t think that another 8 years of the same would be good for them?

Re: Analyst: Cambridge Analytica, Palantir and Quid Helped Trump Win Election (2017)

#6
post #5

No, they didn’t. Trump won because people liked his message. Plain and simple. These companies existed long before 2016 and if they couldn’t help other legitimate candidates get elected, what could they have done so magical for Trump? Is it really so hard to believe that people didn’t like Hillary and didn’t think that another 8 years of the same would be good for them?

Yes, it’s hard to believe that when you consider Hillary won the popular vote.

Re: Analyst: Cambridge Analytica, Palantir and Quid Helped Trump Win Election (2017)

#7
Is there actually any evidence that CA are actually good at data analysis? Everything I read makes it seem like they were one of the many "big data consultancies" of the era that were basically snake oil.

(Which is not to say what they did was not wrong, just that I doubt it was effective)

Re: Analyst: Cambridge Analytica, Palantir and Quid Helped Trump Win Election (2017)

#8

So are we at the point where we believe the presentation of the message, vice the content of the message decides american politics? It seems like maybe we should try to understand why the message was so effective?

What do believe the content of the "message" was? Is it a set of deliverables? What connection do you think there is between the message and actual policy that Trump has enacted?

Re: Analyst: Cambridge Analytica, Palantir and Quid Helped Trump Win Election (2017)

#9
post #5

No, they didn’t. Trump won because people liked his message. Plain and simple. These companies existed long before 2016 and if they couldn’t help other legitimate candidates get elected, what could they have done so magical for Trump? Is it really so hard to believe that people didn’t like Hillary and didn’t think that another 8 years of the same would be good for them?

Yes, it’s hard to believe that when you consider Hillary won the popular vote.

... based almost entirely on votes from one, unusually populous state, with different economics and demographics from the rest of the country. Winning one state by a landslide and losing 48 others (or whatever the exact numbers were) by a hairsbreadth still means you lost in 47 states.

Hillary quite openly stated that she didn't care about the so-called "flyover" states (the "deplorables"), why is anyone surprised that in return, they voted against her?

Re: Analyst: Cambridge Analytica, Palantir and Quid Helped Trump Win Election (2017)

#10
post #5

No, they didn’t. Trump won because people liked his message. Plain and simple. These companies existed long before 2016 and if they couldn’t help other legitimate candidates get elected, what could they have done so magical for Trump? Is it really so hard to believe that people didn’t like Hillary and didn’t think that another 8 years of the same would be good for them?

Yes, it’s hard to believe that when you consider Hillary won the popular vote.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN