Tonight tens of thousands sex workers are devestated that their safer tool for finding clients is shutting down. Exploitative sex trafficking will continue unabated, but independent working people will be forced into more dangerous situations.
LOL at craigslist being "safe." That site was always sketchy as hell.
Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA
331–340 of 654 posts
Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA
#332What if those sites move their operations to other countries
Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA
#333Earlier quoted context omitted.
Actually .onion prostitution services exist already and have for a long time. There was at least one that was very popular around 5 years ago, but I don't remember the name. But you are absolutely right, this is pushing sex workers further underground and therefore making their lives more dangerous.
Would it be surprising to say that trading in this might include Bitcoin?
Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA
#334Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately we've had a very poor week for internet freedom. However much of it has been the result of corporate overreach. This week: Reddit bans Cigar, beer and Alchohol trading subreddits, toy bb gun sales, and gun related coupon clippers Youtube (and facebook?) banned Channels featuring guns they deem inappropriate. Including videos regarding proper safety and maintenance. It has become clear to be that the int…
>This week: Reddit bans Cigar, beer and Alchohol trading subreddits, toy bb gun sales, and gun related coupon clippers Reddit also banned subs that were used for sourcing marijuana, designer drugs, xanax.. direct deals onsite. i'm not defending the drug war, but when you only include the subs you wrote the move looks really silly. if people were only doing giveaways and trading toy bb guns, those subs would still be…
So, reddit is moralizing, has a logically inconsistent position, and deserve to be called out for that.
Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA
#335Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, yes it can. You have to dismiss massive amounts of male testimonies to say that consent has never ever been removed after the fact. Reasoning recursively: To dismiss males’ testimonials, you’d need to take girls’ words at face value, which, in itself, demonstrates that girls’ words are taken at face value by a lot of people in society, hence the recurring massive problem of false convictions.
The idea that there's a recurring massive problem of false convictions for rape is bizarre. In most countries it's extremely difficult to get alleged rape prosecuted in the first place and the conviction rate is low. I'm not going to dispute that it might have happened in some cases but it's a comparatively rare problem. (Also, I'm going to assume you're not a native English speaker - the contrasting group nouns shou…
Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA
#336Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA
#337Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA
#338This is not surprising, but sad. Years ago, i was dragged (i was the only engineer in the local office) into a whitehouse (or maybe it was state department, i can't remember) sponsored working group on online sex trafficking. The non-profits dedicated to fighting this, while seemingly well-intentioned, were completely and totally unwilling to see any other perspective or try to find shared ground. It was scorched ear…
In defense of the "scorched earth approach or nothing" folks: from my perspective... it's a completely and totally human response to faceless, blameless, unapproachable (from their perspective) perpetrators and facilitators of systematic abuse and exploitation of innocent and vulnerable people. If you've ever felt frustrated at an IVR system for routine tasks such as banking, restaurant reservations, canceling a gym…
Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA
#339They'll just move to the "therapeutic" section as masseuses. I totally respect the mission of preventing sex trafficking, but it just feels like they're playing whack-a-mole.
Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA
#340Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apparently trading your body for sex is somehow metaphysically different to trading your body for labor.
It most certainly is for an indeterminate number of people.