Earlier quoted context omitted.
The winning candidate spent significantly less money in this instance. Also I tend to agree with Citizens United. Unions and Corporations should be allowed to express their views on a candidate. If there is someone running for office and making a BS claim about steel workers, I would want steelworkers unions to have the right to advertise and inform me that it is BS. Also if you get into issue based stuff, it becomes…
Trump received billions in free advertising in the form of “earned media”. I don’t know if one could even account for all the third party spending. Money is not speech, corporations are not people. Any one who cares about free speech would advocate for restoring the Fairness Doctrine, so we know that angle is just rhetoric.
What does this even mean? It costs money to put advertisements in mass media. Either you believe everybody should be able to do that, or you believe that only some people should be able to address the public at large.