Live data from Hacker News

Reddit and the Struggle to Detoxify the Internet

newyorker.com

391–400 of 757 posts

Re: Reddit and the Struggle to Detoxify the Internet

#391
post #37

> Struggle to Detoxify the Internet The internet isn't toxic. It's the people who are toxic. These people are just as noxious in real life even if some of them hide it when their identities are known. Can anything be done to detoxify the people, or do we just treat them like spam and filter them out? And what happens next when millions of rabid voices are suppressed? The toxic people don't cease to exist, we just won…

> These people are just as noxious in real life even if some of them hide it when their identities are known.

I don't think so. A lot of people, and this is especially true with Twitter, get noxious because they found an audience there to "amuse" and entertain, which might amplify the temptation for "troll behavior", especially when that audience is of the same political/cultural leaning as the speaker. Social media inflate egos. Some people who might feel insecure in real life find a community there where they can feel like someone, not by doing something positive but by being mean and condescending to whom they deem their ennemy.

However social media didn't create these divisions, they just amplify them.

IMHO Twitter is a proof that even with real identities, people will engage in toxic behavior provided they feel supported by a large audience. Of all the social media I found Twitter to be the nastiest of all.

By contrast, aside from a few brigading, Reddit communities are often isolated, self contained and don't "leak". It takes a user to actively go on a sub to see its content, while Twitter is constantly pushing stuffs to its users, even the nastiest ones.

Re: Reddit and the Struggle to Detoxify the Internet

#393
post #284

Reddit used to be a place where you could post links to anything on the internet (kind of like this place) and comment on it (without signing up with your email). Now it's place more like Facebook with algorithms based on your personal taste, geolocation, forced email, shadow banning, banning of politically incorrect subreddits, endless political posts and "Futurology" and "Uplifting" news articles. Free speech on re…

Reddit has a common frontpage (two, actually: /popular and /all) and user-customizable list of subreddits. > algorithms based on your personal taste, only for recommending subs to try > geolocation only for recommending subs to try > forced email no it does not > shadow banning extremely rare, and per-sub, not reddit-wide > banning of politically incorrect subreddits extremely rare; most of why Reddit is publicly des…

> extremely rare, and per-sub, not reddit-wide

from your list, it's the only thing it's not correct:

there's a site wide shadow-ban that is only done by admins. that means if you post something, nobody will see but for you everything will show up as normal. subreddit moderators can approve your comment and it will show up. this started as a measure against spammers but it seems like normal users get shadow banned too.

now there's normal ban, where you can be banned from a subreddit (you can't post but you can browse) and there's a reddit-wide ban (your account gets basically deleted).

and there's also AutoModerator "shadow-ban" which makes use of reddit's auto moderator to delete a user's comment as soon as it get posted.

Re: Reddit and the Struggle to Detoxify the Internet

#394
post #324

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN works very poorly, and worse by the year. I've been using HN since 2009, I've been on a wide variety of discussion platforms going back to usenet, HN has had its moment in the sun and that has largely passed. Voting on HN barely has an effect, and I suspect that the average votes per comment on HN has gone way down year over year. People just don't vote on posts as often as you'd think, not anymore. A related prob…

> ...I suspect that the average votes per comment on HN has gone way down year over year OK, I'll bite! A cursory look at the data shows a clear increase in average votes on comments from 2007 until 2012, which is the only year with a dip, followed by steady growth until the present all-time high.

Huh. Is this total votes or votes per comment? I'm curious what the median number of total votes on comments that have at least one vote is.

Re: Reddit and the Struggle to Detoxify the Internet

#395
post #46

So we've tried: - Real identities (Facebook comments) - Voting and self moderation (Reddit, HN, etc.) - Strong moderation (Reddit, HN) They all result in toxic comments, trolling, an echo chamber,or worse, a complete lack of participation. There's no real solution to this problem. However, if you create consequences or a cost to commenting you'd eliminate toxic comments and trolling at the cost of less participation…

HN generally works very well. The echo chamber problem is due to allowing downvotes IMO. In my experience that simply leads to minority viewpoints being downvoted. Instead, downvotes should be removed, and people should be allowed to flag abusive comments.

> HN generally works very well

After reading a few discussions over the last few days, I was thinking to my self that HN was better than ever, and very good (with one serious shortcoming). Even the echo chamber is much better than I remember.

EDIT: The shortcoming, IMHO, is the abandonment of politics. HN is the ideal place to solve that problem, with s sophisticated audience open to and interested in experimentation and in problem solving. The goal of propagandists is not to persuade you, but to paralyze you; to shut down real discussion and debate. HN is, unwittingly, capitulating and cooperating with them. HN is another success for them.

Re: Reddit and the Struggle to Detoxify the Internet

#397

This problem is easy to solve: give users the tools to do their own filtering. But services like to pretend that it's a hard problem because they don't want to actually cede that control to their users. The whole point of controlling the communication networks is to control what and how people say and hear.

It’s surprising how much social media bullshits on this issue. RSS had the standard and solution a decade ago. Being able to filter even by simple regex would be so much better than Facebook/Google’s “algorithm.” But it would allow us to filter out ads. It would also allow for community-driven white/black lists. But again, wouldn’t allow Coke and HBO to make you look at stuff.

I actually use some combination of Tampermonkey and uBlock to filter out Facebook ads (I forget which finally did it, since they work hard to make those things tricky to block). Haven't thought about using it to filter out offensive posts, but that's because I just unfollow people if they pass a completely subjective tolerance barrier.

By virtue of delivering content to your browser, Facebook has put the power in your hands. It's how you use your browser that determines what you see. ;)

Re: Reddit and the Struggle to Detoxify the Internet

#398

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry--it is satire, but the comment represents literally how it comes across to me when I see claims that "better education" will effectively bring about less toxic discussions. The implication is clear: If only people were rational and educated, like me, they wouldn't think the way they do, and then we would all agree.

How about this: first teach advanced critical thinking skills, so people have the skills (if not the will, that's another problem) necessary to see through propaganda from both sides. I have a feeling a lot of people would have issues with this approach though.

How do you teach critical thinking?

Re: Reddit and the Struggle to Detoxify the Internet

#399

This problem is easy to solve: give users the tools to do their own filtering. But services like to pretend that it's a hard problem because they don't want to actually cede that control to their users. The whole point of controlling the communication networks is to control what and how people say and hear.

I strongly disagree, although unfortunately I can't really propose a better solution.

Filtering just enhances the echo chamber, it's true that social networks are proactive about it and "pre-filter" things but I think they're actually getting pretty good about it, they give the users what they want. And what we want is content that agrees with us, makes us feel right and confirms our biases. People effectively "filter" by selecting who they follow, what they subscribe to etc...

Furthermore I don't think filtering "toxicity" on huge open communities can really work because most people out there are terrible at "not feeding the trolls". I've tried /ignoring trolls on IRC for instance, but then you're left with the messages of other people engaging the troll and it's somewhat even worse because you don't have the context. Then you try to block the people replying to the troll but then you have people replying to the people replying to the troll...

Personally I feel it's mostly a non problem, I don't have twitter, I don't have a reddit account, I don't have facebook... I'm only active on smaller communities like HN. I think humans simply suck at behaving correctly in large crowds, especially anonymously online. There's no fixing reddit or facebook, they've just become the modern equivalent of scribbling a swastika on a bathroom stall. Cat gifs, pun threads, racist comments, it's the same thing really, instant gratification without any effort, just watch the karma go up or down. If you don't set any bar for acceptable content then you're bound to be overrun with low-effort content.

Re: Reddit and the Struggle to Detoxify the Internet

#400

Not one word about the HUGE Antifa presence or doxing by left wing conspirators and agitators. This is exactly why I don't read the New Yorker. I would consider reading it if they gave light to both sides of this issue. But they don't. This is not journalism. Edit: u/spez was caught editing user comments on certain subs he publicly disagrees with. How he's still CEO is beyond me. At least he admits he's a troll. Edit…

Downvotes but no replies. School yard bully techniques. Triggered you are.
Post reply on HN