Earlier quoted context omitted.
Their security was bad, no doubt. I don't see how that justifies deleting their data, though.
As TFA describes it, the first deletion last year by the heroic hacker actually interrupted another hacker's access to the data. Why hadn't that other hacker deleted it? Maybe he enjoyed having access to private pictures and communications of children, teens, and adults... Does that sound like a good situation?
A Hacker Has Wiped a Spyware Company’s Servers
111–120 of 120 posts
Re: A Hacker Has Wiped a Spyware Company’s Servers
#112I see no reason to praise the hacker. He destroyed a legitimate company's private data for no purpose other than his flawed moral reasoning. The company provides a way for parents to monitor their children and other legitimate business practices. Obviously, the software can be used for nefarious purposes but so can almost any other software. U.S. representatives and senators try to ban encryption using the same exact…
> legitimate business practices Whenever I read this phrase, it always has a sense something like legal, therefore ethical or legal, therefore OK , and.. (this is not an easy sentence to finish) I wonder where people learn to think like that. OK, apart from the pressure of the entire commercial/corporate/advertising apparatus.. Maybe it's surprising it isn't more common. I guess it's the norm, in some circles. I'm na…
Re: A Hacker Has Wiped a Spyware Company’s Servers
#113I see no reason to praise the hacker. He destroyed a legitimate company's private data for no purpose other than his flawed moral reasoning. The company provides a way for parents to monitor their children and other legitimate business practices. Obviously, the software can be used for nefarious purposes but so can almost any other software. U.S. representatives and senators try to ban encryption using the same exact…
Well, I side with that hacker for this, taken from this article — "I don't want to live in a world where younger generations grow up without privacy." While parents make a lot of decisions for children in their best interests, this certainly wasn't one of them. The fact that children might later suffer for no fault of theirs and live with something for life because of such a company makes me a lot more angry. It's be…
Re: A Hacker Has Wiped a Spyware Company’s Servers
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, you should never commit your secrets, not even to a private github repo, and not even to a privately hosted git server. Doing so increases your attack surface, sometimes in surprising ways. Now, if your secrets are encrypted before being committed (using something like ansible vault) and the encryption key is not stored in the repo, that may be ok. However, you still need to be aware that any time you rotate that…
So how do you do version the configuration management for the cluster that runs everything? It needs to be versioned, and yet with just the data in it you need to be able to recreate your entire environment from scratch.
There are lots of ways of doing this. git-crypt is one that is configuration management agnostic. Most CM tools have their own way of dealing with secrets and there are CM agnostic tools like git-crypt. I'm not personally familiar with anything besides ansible-vault, but this article seems to provide a pretty good summary of several options: https://www.threatstack.com/blog/cloud-security-best-practic...
Re: A Hacker Has Wiped a Spyware Company’s Servers
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you have a recommended security checklist for something like this? I remember seeing an old github repo with a bunch of good information but I cannot seem to find it and my search results are... unhelpful at best.
Checklists are cool and all. But, you shouldn't need a checklist to know that you shouldn't ship API keys.
Re: A Hacker Has Wiped a Spyware Company’s Servers
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
I get what you are saying, but there can be legal/financial concerns attached to these things.
Monitoring usage of a corporate issue piece of equipment is very different than using it against a private individual without their knowledge
Re: A Hacker Has Wiped a Spyware Company’s Servers
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
As TFA describes it, the first deletion last year by the heroic hacker actually interrupted another hacker's access to the data. Why hadn't that other hacker deleted it? Maybe he enjoyed having access to private pictures and communications of children, teens, and adults... Does that sound like a good situation?
No, that doesn't sound like a good situation. You want to know some other big companies that have been hacked? - LinkedIn, MySpace, Adobe, Dropbox, DailyMotion, Sony, Kickstarter, Equifax... ad infinitum. Do these companies also deserve to have their data deleted?
Re: A Hacker Has Wiped a Spyware Company’s Servers
#118This is one of those cases where I probably should feel bad for the company being repeatedly hacked to the point of being ripe for being shut down, but I just can't muster the will right now. If you are in the business of collecting data without users' explicit permission, and can't protect that data from being accessed or deleted, you shoudln't be in business.
> If you are in the business of collecting data without users' explicit permission, or a warrant from a court, you shouldn't be in business. Fixed that for you
Re: A Hacker Has Wiped a Spyware Company’s Servers
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
??!? Their 'data' includes all the photos YOUR KIDS take on their phones. Do you not realize how much absolutely idiotic shit kids do with their smartphones these days? Which they store in an an obviously unsafe way, as evidenced by the fact that they've been hacked via a super-super-super obvious software flaw... twice (that was widely reported on, most likely many more times). They deserve, and they should get, no…
You know what other services have data that contains photos of your "YOUR KIDS"? Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Sony, Photobucket, and pretty much every other tech company with hosting services. If these companies get hacked, do they deserve to have their data deleted? The answer is no.