Earlier quoted context omitted.
I actually like poisoning them. Not to be malicious but I feel manipulated into training their software for free. "Oh you wanted to sign up for that web forum? Sorry, but you have to do some free work for us first" And if you think that it's somehow good because it's mutually beneficial to train AI to better the future of humanity, don't. That is what their marketing department wants you to think.
The value they're providing is to the forum owner, who has reduced spam-handling workload. So the forum is providing you value, you are providing Google value, and Google is providing the forum value.
Facebook open-sources Detectron
151–160 of 188 posts
Re: Facebook open-sources Detectron
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
The idea that you have no requirement to is wrong - your site may not have sensitive information but without SSL it can be MITM'd and used as a vector for malware, ad injection, etc.
You argument is valid (somewhat), but I don't think that I attract enough traffic on a constant basis, to invest the time and effort to SSL up all my domains. So far I've had a less than stellar experience with letsencrypt, so I'm not quite ready to go all free-certs just quite yet. It also requires a rebuild of my web-server[1] which I've been putting off for a very long time already. --- [1] See my other post in th…
Re: Facebook open-sources Detectron
#153> Beyond research, a number of Facebook teams use this platform to train custom models for a variety of applications including augmented reality and community integrity. Any idea what they mean by "community integrity"?
Maybe you want to censor internally part of an image for privacy reasons. For instance, in my country you cannot use or publish children images without parents consent. The fine for doing that is way higher than your benefits even discounting bad press.
Re: Facebook open-sources Detectron
#154Also noteworthy: the Apache 2 license, which includes a patent grant (unlike the previous Facebook licenses that have caused concern in the past).
caffe2 (which this is built on) was switched from bsd+patents to Apache2 a while ago too.
Re: Facebook open-sources Detectron
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not expert on this but what I'm seeing is that port 443 is serving up a response when jaruzel.com is requested on that port. While you may not be actively advertising that domain with https URLs, it is valid for clients to request one speculatively. There isn't a valid cert for that domain and for some reason for server is offering a different one. Presumably you need to unbind 443 from that host header name (thi…
So... I have an IP... that IP points to a router, that router port-forwards ports 80 and 443 blindly to a web server, on that web server is a bunch of websites. IIS knows which ones to serve to clients based on a) the host-header, and b) the port. jaruzel.com:443 is not valid, but because I run an older version of IIS[1], that does not support SNI, the cert is bound to the port, not the host-header. As such any domai…
Re: Facebook open-sources Detectron
#156I'm happy that tech companies are open sourcing basic research all the time, and thinking a lot about what would have happened if large pharmacy companies did the same thing. I'm just hopeful that with new biotech companies the science behind curing people will get faster as well.
Re: Facebook open-sources Detectron
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
The value they're providing is to the forum owner, who has reduced spam-handling workload. So the forum is providing you value, you are providing Google value, and Google is providing the forum value.
Sure, but if the public has to provide Google with free data, we should make laws requiring Google to open source the entire ReCaptcha training set.
Re: Facebook open-sources Detectron
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure, but if the public has to provide Google with free data, we should make laws requiring Google to open source the entire ReCaptcha training set.
Why?
Re: Facebook open-sources Detectron
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a bit disappointing, when caffe2 was released it was stated that mobile is a big focus, but things like this don't support mobile (even though some of this was demoed by FB on a phone).
FWIW we have some similar R-CNN models using this codebase running in the FB apps on iOS/Android with Caffe2 - with some neat bells and whistles (eg full execution of the compute graph on the device GPU where available via Metal/OpenGL). I’ll look into adding a mobile tutorial for Detectron if you’re interested.
Re: Facebook open-sources Detectron
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google doesn't even show a catpcha if they have enough tracking info for toy to verify you're a human, which is pretty simple for them if you don't clear all your cookies for a few days. I'm pretty sure Google thinks if they have to show you a catpcha they've failed, but along with that they don't feel the need to make the catpchas particularly easy if they do have to show it.
I take it you don't use a VPN. I often have to pass a captcha just to use google search when in an IPv4 address. (Considering that ISPs are now allowed to sell my data, using a VPN seems to be an obvious choice.) It's annoying to the point that it's pushed me to use DuckDuckGo more often and I tend to avoid platforms that require me to continually take their captchas. I used Discord for a little while, but once it st…