Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, precisely. And the first problem can be eliminating tacit acknowledgement of the legitimacy of oppressive governments.
No need to bring all of your moral judgement into everything. Would you treat a wounded criminal or would their criminality effect your ability to treat them? One problem at a time.
IMHO, a better one:
Your friend (used loosely in this case) is doing criminal acts. Would you tell him to stop doing criminal acts while you treat him?
---
Sometimes journalist take this "ALLWAYS two sides to every story" and "each side is equal" crap too far.
See the success of Wolf's book on Trump.