Earlier quoted context omitted.
People aren't analyzable by computers, at least on an individual basis. Women tend to be more interested in individual relationships than men, and you can't have a relationship with a computer. In my opinion, it is pretty obvious from the clearly differing motivations of the genders why there is such a gender divide in academics. Maybe it has to do with intelligence, but "intelligence" seems to largely be determined…
"Women tend to be more interested in individual relationships than men, and you can't have a relationship with a computer." OK, firstly, my Mac started crying when he read that. Poor mac! Secondly, the broad generalisations that you make about men and women is exactly the problem. Here's a hint: Women working in IT, and particularly programming, are there precisely because we too are interested in technical subjects…
I can see the problem if women don't naturally have such interests and they're somehow forced to be this way through societal expectations. But is this really the case?