OpenSolaris is dead
11–20 of 115 posts
Re: OpenSolaris is dead
#12Since the slogan "don't be evil" is already in use, I'm guessing Oracle is going for "be evil" instead?
Sometimes, I admire Oracle more than the supposed do-gooders at Google. Oracle is a for-profit entity, they will take any legal or tactical advantage they can get (e.g., lawsuit over Java in Android), and they make no bones about it. I don't like everything they do, but you know what you get with them. Google says "don't be evil", yet they back off that principle when it's inconvenient (e.g., caving in to Chinese cen…
I don't see either censorship in China or the net neutrality proposal (which I don't know much about) as bonafide "evil". You may disagree, but it's hard to say that they are evil or done with evil intent.
Oracle, on the other hand, is pretty easy to call evil because they act out of cruel self-interest practically exclusively. Oracle is always taking cheap shots.
Re: OpenSolaris is dead
#13"We will determine a simple, cost-effective means of getting enterprise users of prior OpenSolaris binary releases to migrate to S11 Express." -- Says enough.
"We will continue to grow a vibrant developer and system administrator community for Solaris." -- I really wonder how.
Re: OpenSolaris is dead
#14Re: OpenSolaris is dead
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
So I should take away from this post that Oracle has given you more than Google did? Because that's what it sounds like to me. Personally I admire companies that are giving me value. > yet they back off that principle when it's inconvenient Regarding both net neutrality and Chinese censorship, Google did what nobody else did. So I really don't get this line of reasoning. Personally I take away from this that my compa…
So I should take away from this post that Oracle has given you more than Google did? Neither has given me anything that I didn't pay for, either directly or indirectly. Regarding both net neutrality and Chinese censorship, Google did what nobody else did. Which is what, exactly? When push came to shove, they acted no differently than any other large corporation. Personally I take away from this that my company should…
That's not strictly true. I would argue that Google provides a greater amount of consumer surplus than Oracle. Consumer surplus pretty much amounts to value you obtain from a product or service that the producer can't capture in the price.
Re: OpenSolaris is dead
#16If at least ZFS can be salvaged from the wreck...
Re: OpenSolaris is dead
#17Re: OpenSolaris is dead
#18Since the slogan "don't be evil" is already in use, I'm guessing Oracle is going for "be evil" instead?
Sometimes, I admire Oracle more than the supposed do-gooders at Google. Oracle is a for-profit entity, they will take any legal or tactical advantage they can get (e.g., lawsuit over Java in Android), and they make no bones about it. I don't like everything they do, but you know what you get with them. Google says "don't be evil", yet they back off that principle when it's inconvenient (e.g., caving in to Chinese cen…
Re: OpenSolaris is dead
#19Re: OpenSolaris is dead
#20I thought it was interesting that Linux was completely absent from all of the market position talk.